NMB Keyboards revamp
Posted: 09 Feb 2016, 23:08
I am interested in revamping the NMB Keyboards section. Right now it really only discusses one generation of NMB keyboards. In my travels, and collecting, I have discovered that there are essentially 5 generations of NMB keyboards with respect to case design.
Generation 1:
Thick plastic top case (Keytronic XT or IBM AT style)
Black back plate (metal or plastic) Generation 2:
Thinner top case (Keytronic XT or IBM AT Style)
Biege rear cover with Keyboard and Mouse cable openings. Generation 3:
Model M style, upper case.
Rear cover has cable routing channel Generation 4:
Flat G80-3000 style case
This generation includes the well known RT-8255 keyboards Generation 5:
Reduced footprint compared to Gen 4. My plan is to rework the landing page for NMB Keyboards to have this summary information. Then have a separate page for each generation that details variants, switches used, and known model/part numbers.
Does these seem like a reasonable approach?
Note: Switch, pcb and even keycap design overlap the timeline of these case generations independently. As such case design seems like good starting point for differentiation and identification. Ultimately a Gantt chart style graphic could be used to document the overlap between components over time.
Generation 1:
Thick plastic top case (Keytronic XT or IBM AT style)
Black back plate (metal or plastic) Generation 2:
Thinner top case (Keytronic XT or IBM AT Style)
Biege rear cover with Keyboard and Mouse cable openings. Generation 3:
Model M style, upper case.
Rear cover has cable routing channel Generation 4:
Flat G80-3000 style case
This generation includes the well known RT-8255 keyboards Generation 5:
Reduced footprint compared to Gen 4. My plan is to rework the landing page for NMB Keyboards to have this summary information. Then have a separate page for each generation that details variants, switches used, and known model/part numbers.
Does these seem like a reasonable approach?
Note: Switch, pcb and even keycap design overlap the timeline of these case generations independently. As such case design seems like good starting point for differentiation and identification. Ultimately a Gantt chart style graphic could be used to document the overlap between components over time.