Page 1 of 5
HyperMicro Development
Posted: 27 Jul 2014, 21:14
by 7bit
Posted: 27 Jul 2014, 21:23
by chzel
Looks good to me.
Mounting provisions? or is going to "hang" from the plate?
Posted: 27 Jul 2014, 21:25
by rindorbrot
I still hope for the HyperPoo!
Posted: 27 Jul 2014, 21:25
by scottc
Looks good to me.
Posted: 27 Jul 2014, 21:26
by 7bit
I think I should add some holes. At least one for a pointing stick.
Plate designs come later ...
Other Hyper models will follow, but the smallest is the easiest for testing and cheapest for prototyping.
Posted: 27 Jul 2014, 21:28
by scottc
That's a very good idea. I've got a trackpoint module from an IBM Space Saver waiting for this! I'm just worried that the TP controller will be longer than the HyperMicro PCB.
Posted: 29 Jul 2014, 02:37
by tlem
Option to have usb connector on main pcb?
How about some indicator leds?
Some teensys come with both rows of pins presoldered - add pads for these even though they are not used.
PCB stab holes for shifts, but it might conflict with existing keys.
I like the gray pcb
Posted: 29 Jul 2014, 02:45
by scottc
Why do they say deskthority.org? Is it the non-profit charity version of Deskthority?
Posted: 29 Jul 2014, 02:52
by Compgeke
I think it's more like webwit went insane and bought all the available TLDs for deskthority at the time.
Now we need deskthority.xxx for keyboard internal pictures, just my opinion.
Posted: 29 Jul 2014, 02:57
by scottc
I know, just wondering why 7bit chose .org for the PCB rather than .net.
I agree about deskthority.xxx, maybe we can also get deskthority.club and .technology while we're at it?
Posted: 29 Jul 2014, 12:33
by Muirium
.org is better than .net says someone who's never registered a domain with the latter, because it feels redundant.
Besides, maybe 7bit slipped up, as he's actually working on this?
http://7bit.org
Posted: 29 Jul 2014, 13:43
by 7bit
I know the website is hosted under deskthority.net and not under deskthority.org, but I always type deskthority.org automatically.
This is the prototype so it is supposed to have bugs.
BTW: I will add support for 4 and 7 units space bars (both plate or PCB mounted) and will make 2 PCBs for symmetric and traditional staggering.
Posted: 29 Jul 2014, 13:59
by Muirium
Ah, Hyper µ mode.
Posted: 29 Jul 2014, 14:59
by matt3o
can I have source files
Posted: 29 Jul 2014, 15:06
by scottc
7bit said to demand them, so maybe it would be better to ask like this:
GIVE ME THE SOURCE FILES!
Posted: 29 Jul 2014, 15:09
by Laser
.. or rather, add the request to you your order
Posted: 29 Jul 2014, 15:14
by scottc
You will receive them at some point in time from 3 months from now
On a serious note: can I please get a copy of the source files too?
Posted: 29 Jul 2014, 15:15
by matt3o
just to be clear, I can help making few prototypes.
Posted: 29 Jul 2014, 15:36
by DanielT
it depends on how long it will take you
If you can do the prototypes in under 6 months you are not eligible
But enough joking, this is an interesting project and I would like to play with a 60% prototype maybe even with the Micro
Posted: 29 Jul 2014, 19:47
by 7bit
scottc wrote: ↑7bit said to demand them, so maybe it would be better to ask like this:
GIVE ME THE SOURCE FILES!
Thanks!
This is demanding enough!
BTW:
Is 7mm diameter enough for a trackpopint-hole?
Posted: 29 Jul 2014, 19:48
by matt3o
can do prototypes in 30mins
Posted: 29 Jul 2014, 20:00
by scottc
7bit wrote: ↑BTW:
Is 7mm diameter enough for a trackpopint-hole?
I have a Trackpoint module from an IBM Space Saver, I can check dimensions later tonight.
Posted: 29 Jul 2014, 20:41
by 7bit
7bit wrote: ↑... will make 2 PCBs for symmetric and traditional staggering.
No! Only
one PCB for both staggerings.
Posted: 29 Jul 2014, 21:08
by 7bit
matt3o wrote: ↑can do prototypes in 30mins
How is that?
Posted: 29 Jul 2014, 21:10
by Muirium
Posted: 30 Jul 2014, 00:50
by 7bit
- HyperMicro_PCB_101.png (558.63 KiB) Viewed 9406 times
Posted: 30 Jul 2014, 01:09
by Muirium
Looks good… to my untrained eye.
Posted: 30 Jul 2014, 01:44
by Findecanor
It would be thick with the Teensy there. Why not have it one row up?
Posted: 30 Jul 2014, 09:02
by 7bit
There isn't enough space.
The JD40 even has it in the bottom row!
Posted: 30 Jul 2014, 09:16
by 7bit
OK, I had a thought about it:
Teensy must be turned 180 degrees and moved a bit towards the center (by a pad or so).
Then, 2 columns can be connected directly inside, 4 via the space on top and at least 4 through the space between row 3 and 2. It is possible to connect 2 columns through the bottom rows.
Row 3 and 2 are trivial, but row 1 and 0 should also be easy ...
OK, let's give it a try ...