Page 3 of 5

Posted: 16 Jan 2015, 04:08
by DanielT
I would like to test a 60% :D Have a teensy have some switches diodes

Posted: 16 Jan 2015, 04:15
by webwit
7bit wrote: The latest version:
Image
Yes, yes!

But where's S3:1? :?

Posted: 16 Jan 2015, 08:38
by gogusrl
I'm very interested as well.

Posted: 16 Jan 2015, 08:57
by matt3o
send me one and I'll compile you the firmware :P

please add poker case compatible screw holes!

Posted: 16 Jan 2015, 09:58
by tlt
I'm also interested in putting together a prototype. It's not going to fit a poker case with those mouse buttons is it?

Posted: 16 Jan 2015, 10:40
by 7bit
webwit wrote: ...

But where's S3:1? :?
Shit!
:oops:

I hoped nobody would ever discover the dark secret of this keyboard!
:evilgeek:
matt3o wrote: send me one and I'll compile you the firmware :P
please add poker case compatible screw holes!
tlt wrote: I'm also interested in putting together a prototype. It's not going to fit a poker case with those mouse buttons is it?
What is a Poker case :?

This keyboard indeed is not designed to replace any PCB in any existing case.

Posted: 16 Jan 2015, 10:48
by 7bit
The bot has decided:
scottc
Muirium
DanielT
matt3o
and suka, because he must design a case for it! :evilgeek:

Posted: 16 Jan 2015, 11:06
by scottc
Excellent. Thank you 7bit. :D

The Poker form-factor case idea is a good one. There are lots of very nice after-market Poker cases. I think I remember matt3o having the measurements in a thread from the past few months but I can't find it...

Posted: 16 Jan 2015, 11:37
by matt3o
7bit wrote: This keyboard indeed is not designed to replace any PCB in any existing case.
completely forgot about the bottom row of switches!

Posted: 16 Jan 2015, 12:29
by 7bit
Little correction:
qHACK_PCB_002_front.png
qHACK_PCB_002_front.png (1.37 MiB) Viewed 4930 times
qHACK_PCB_002_back.png
qHACK_PCB_002_back.png (1.23 MiB) Viewed 4930 times
The mouse buttons are now as close to the switches as on the HyperMicro.
:-)

Posted: 16 Jan 2015, 12:49
by matt3o
what is the exact width/height of the board and what switch spacing did you use (19mm)?

Posted: 16 Jan 2015, 13:23
by MrMen
This 60% looks great ! I hope the bot will have testing one in stock soon.

Posted: 16 Jan 2015, 13:43
by 7bit
switch spacing: 1 unit = 0.75" = 19.05mm
dimensions:
5.35 units tall and 15 units wide, shifted by 0.3 units from bottom, ie 0.3 units gap to bottom edge and 0.05 units to top edge, 0 units to left and right edges.
4.0125" x 11.25" = 101.9175mm x 285.75mm
:roll:

Posted: 16 Jan 2015, 13:47
by tlt
So it's like a 61% board? ;-)

Posted: 16 Jan 2015, 14:40
by matt3o
7bit wrote: switch spacing: 1 unit = 0.75" = 19.05mm
dimensions:
5.35 units tall and 15 units wide, shifted by 0.3 units from bottom, ie 0.3 units gap to bottom edge and 0.05 units to top edge, 0 units to left and right edges.
4.0125" x 11.25" = 101.9175mm x 285.75mm
:roll:
darn imperial system lover!

Posted: 16 Jan 2015, 14:48
by 7bit
Well, the definition (according to Cherry) of 1 unit is precisely 0.75" and 19.05 mm, so I have no other choice.
;-)

Posted: 16 Jan 2015, 16:05
by matt3o
they have 2 specs: EU and US. For the US one they picked the closest value to 19mm which is 0.75". In fact in the EU specs the switch hole is exactly 14mm.

Posted: 16 Jan 2015, 16:14
by 7bit
Plate cut-outs are indeed 14mm but switches are 19.05mm apart!
:-)

There are not 2 specifications!
:mad:

Posted: 16 Jan 2015, 16:17
by matt3o
7bit wrote: Plate cut-outs are indeed 14mm but switches are 19.05mm apart!
:-)

There are not 2 specifications!
:mad:
don't make me search in the backups! :P

Posted: 16 Jan 2015, 16:26
by 7bit
There is a file Keymodule_MX.pdf that shows all information I needed to make the PCBs, including 1 units == 19.05mm!
:-)

Posted: 16 Jan 2015, 16:33
by matt3o
that seems a rather old document. Anyway, it works for me!

I have two documents which are pretty close to that one, one entirely in inches the other in mm.

Posted: 16 Jan 2015, 16:42
by Muirium
No chance of this fitting in Poker cases, like Pexon's cast metal ones, I assume? The extra PCB area for the buttons doesn't look forgiving.

Posted: 16 Jan 2015, 16:46
by 7bit
No, because of the mouse buttons.

It is from March 1994.

What do you mean "old"?
:?

Posted: 16 Jan 2015, 16:50
by lowpoly
Re Mousewheels: I just opened a cheap Dell mouse that had an optical wheel. Very fine spokes. Model number is M-UAN DEL1.

Dell creates detents by letting a spring wire reach into the spokes. Krrrk krrrk krrrrk. When you remove it the wheel runs smoothly but stops almost immediately due to low weight. Maybe put it in a lathe, reduce the diameter and press it into a metal ring.

Image

Read Findecanor's comment (first post on page 2).

Posted: 16 Jan 2015, 17:06
by scottc
I have several of those mice and I really quite like the scroll wheels on them. Very nice.

Posted: 16 Jan 2015, 17:10
by webwit
Lowpoly's has those nice vertical mousebuttons which take no extra space...

Posted: 16 Jan 2015, 17:14
by gogusrl
I want to use a Logitech G9(x) scroll wheel or even better one from a Microsoft Office Keyboard which I guess won't work with qHack.

Image

Posted: 16 Jan 2015, 17:33
by 7bit
^^^ Microsoft products are always ugly, no matter if software, or keyboards!
:mad:

Image
^^^ The reason why the qHack must be a little bit larger is because there are regular switches in the way of these 2 mouse buttons!
:roll:

edit:
Wait!

What about mounting the mouse buttons at the underside?
:evilgeek:

Posted: 16 Jan 2015, 17:45
by DanielT
What about no such thing as mouse buttons ? I hate these kind of things ....

Posted: 16 Jan 2015, 17:47
by 7bit
Image
:roll:
Hint: This is the original qHack design, that webwit asked to be made.

As you can see, there are 3 mouse buttons that are below the bottom row.