Model F Battleship connundrum...
Posted: 08 Dec 2025, 15:54
I have three 'workstations', one at my stereo, one at my home office desk, and one in my Sprinter van, the latter two being the most used 'workstations'. The computer is a laptop that plugs into one of two docks, one in the van and one in the office- the stereo is in the office and the same dock feeds both keyboard/screen/mouse setups.
For the office desk and van setups I use an IBM M122 Type I, with a custom key layout. I am in the process of working with Unicomp to produce a card or board that will allow the use of a similar keyboard at the stereo setup. Its a very custom layout, picture of which is uploaded.
I have been wanting to replace the office desk setup with a Model F battleship. The question is whether that unit would be an IBM or a Model F projects unit. I am a little unusual in that I truly love the layout of the original Battleship design, including and especially the cross nav. I am also absolutely used to my location for the escape key (which is labeled 'Panic' on the top left of the side F-bank).
I have talked to Joe, I think on here, about his opinion of his board versus the IBM unit, and of course he prefers the Model F project board. He mentions several advantages, including its metal construction (which I don't see as anything other than nuetral; metal and good quality plastic both have their merits), its younger age (which I certainly see as a plus when it comes to electronics), and it not needing a converter, all of which are true. I also think he prefers that for two additional solid reasons: 1) He wants to sell me a board (which I don't see as him being in the wrong), and 2) pictures of his IBM Model F Battleships show that he clearly prefers T-navs.
He has also told me that there are sensing arrays that would permit the activation of a cross nav, which is why this isn't quite a deal breaker, even though the only way to really do this would involve machining out an additional 3 keys worth of holes, and leave two unused key holes (or assign those keys to something else). This does not address the issue that it is still materially different than the layout of an IBM unit, including function key angles, locations, and so forth. I suspect I could get used to having two different layouts in regular use, but I consider it less than ideal.
But there is another issue I face when it comes to IBM F122s- they don't seem to exist in functional condition for sale at the moment; there is one on eBay that has rust issues, a connector issue, and is stated not to work, for $275 + shipping. Since I would probably need to replace its controller card at the very least, and still have no proof of its ability to repair, this seems like a risky proposition, to say the least.
Does anyone have a line on a working F122? Barring that, should I keep my search up- and possibly lose the opportunity to obtain a Model F projects Battleship- or settle for a Model F Projects board? Has anyone on here had the chance to play with both?
For the office desk and van setups I use an IBM M122 Type I, with a custom key layout. I am in the process of working with Unicomp to produce a card or board that will allow the use of a similar keyboard at the stereo setup. Its a very custom layout, picture of which is uploaded.
I have been wanting to replace the office desk setup with a Model F battleship. The question is whether that unit would be an IBM or a Model F projects unit. I am a little unusual in that I truly love the layout of the original Battleship design, including and especially the cross nav. I am also absolutely used to my location for the escape key (which is labeled 'Panic' on the top left of the side F-bank).
I have talked to Joe, I think on here, about his opinion of his board versus the IBM unit, and of course he prefers the Model F project board. He mentions several advantages, including its metal construction (which I don't see as anything other than nuetral; metal and good quality plastic both have their merits), its younger age (which I certainly see as a plus when it comes to electronics), and it not needing a converter, all of which are true. I also think he prefers that for two additional solid reasons: 1) He wants to sell me a board (which I don't see as him being in the wrong), and 2) pictures of his IBM Model F Battleships show that he clearly prefers T-navs.
He has also told me that there are sensing arrays that would permit the activation of a cross nav, which is why this isn't quite a deal breaker, even though the only way to really do this would involve machining out an additional 3 keys worth of holes, and leave two unused key holes (or assign those keys to something else). This does not address the issue that it is still materially different than the layout of an IBM unit, including function key angles, locations, and so forth. I suspect I could get used to having two different layouts in regular use, but I consider it less than ideal.
But there is another issue I face when it comes to IBM F122s- they don't seem to exist in functional condition for sale at the moment; there is one on eBay that has rust issues, a connector issue, and is stated not to work, for $275 + shipping. Since I would probably need to replace its controller card at the very least, and still have no proof of its ability to repair, this seems like a risky proposition, to say the least.
Does anyone have a line on a working F122? Barring that, should I keep my search up- and possibly lose the opportunity to obtain a Model F projects Battleship- or settle for a Model F Projects board? Has anyone on here had the chance to play with both?