NEWS #2
Las Vegas shooting...all I want to say is thank God the shooter didn't have an M134D. Why possessing guns is legal in America anyway? This video explains:
Put efficient automatic killing tools into the hands of people who could go haywire anytime, by doing this, do you increase the chance of safety or threat, you tell me. But, there are indeed historical reasons behind this, early settlers did need guns to protect themselves and rob the natives.Redmaus wrote: ↑2nd amendment exists to protect the others. If you can't grasp this concept I don't know what to tell you.
Obvidouly you don't, coz you can't, maybe because you're too dumb or lazy to learn Chinese, but your children will. Even if you can speak Chinese, don't mention the brutality thing, otherwise you'll probably be ridiculed like this:"A stupid **** from former Nazi country call us brutal, come on..." China is more civilized and safer than you ever thought.Shihatsu wrote: ↑Why is this dumbass always posting this videos? Do we go to chinese forums and post videos of the brutality in china? Stupid ****, piss off, you suck. Go trolling in chinese forums and get banned.
Polarized? What's been polarized exactly? Point it out plz. Don't give me the Fascist shit: "I can't take the facts he posted neither can I refute them, so let's just ban him."pixelheresy wrote: ↑This is not the first time Mr. Nobody posted shit like this or inserted polarizing (and sometimes borderline racist) stuff to bait people.
I think it is high time the admins boot him.I get the funny feeling he is a paid shill or something.
Yeah, let's help'em wake up that's exactly the purpose of the OP.fohat wrote: ↑The one about the Princeton study was pretty interesting.
For me there was nothing there that I didn't already know, but there are still a lot of people around who just don't "get it"
YOU HEARD EM BOIS TIME TO TAKE AWAY THE CARSMr.Nobody wrote: ↑ Put efficient automatic killing tools into the hands of people who could go haywire anytime, by doing this, do you increase the chance of safety or threat, you tell me. But, there are indeed historical reasons behind this, early settlers did need guns to protect themselves and rob the natives.
Yes, fuck-up people will do some crazy shit like crashing a vehicle into a crowd...still less efficient and lethal than machine guns, I mean, at least we should raise the par as high as we can. When guns are banned, robbers won't get armed easily as well, a baseball-bat fight is less lethal than a machine gun fight. Even air guns are banned in China...that's why it's so safe here, hard to get "tools" for people and criminals alike.Redmaus wrote: ↑YOU HEARD EM BOIS TIME TO TAKE AWAY THE CARSMr.Nobody wrote: ↑ Put efficient automatic killing tools into the hands of people who could go haywire anytime, by doing this, do you increase the chance of safety or threat, you tell me. But, there are indeed historical reasons behind this, early settlers did need guns to protect themselves and rob the natives.
But for real, do you really think that taking away guns will stop mass killings? Fucked up people will find a way. Also considering how corrupt our government is today, I don't like the idea of everyone being disarmed except for the government. I also don't like the thought of being defenseless in case a robber breaks into my home.
Just put him on your ignore list. He is a complete waste of the one child policy.cookie wrote: ↑I don't quite get why people need to share such stuff in a keybaord forum? And no, offtopic is no excuse in this case.
china? SAFE? lmaoMr.Nobody wrote: ↑Yes, fuck-up people will do some crazy shit like crashing a vehicle into a crowd...still less efficient and lethal than machine guns, I mean, at least we should raise the par as high as we can. When guns are banned, robbers won't get armed easily as well, a baseball-bat fight is less lethal than a machine gun fight. Even air guns are banned in China...that's why it's so safe here, hard to get "tools" for people and criminals alike.Redmaus wrote: ↑YOU HEARD EM BOIS TIME TO TAKE AWAY THE CARSMr.Nobody wrote: ↑ Put efficient automatic killing tools into the hands of people who could go haywire anytime, by doing this, do you increase the chance of safety or threat, you tell me. But, there are indeed historical reasons behind this, early settlers did need guns to protect themselves and rob the natives.
But for real, do you really think that taking away guns will stop mass killings? Fucked up people will find a way. Also considering how corrupt our government is today, I don't like the idea of everyone being disarmed except for the government. I also don't like the thought of being defenseless in case a robber breaks into my home.
@cookie
JP! wrote: ↑Are guns really the problem?
Think about the power of information. Based solely on the harm principle, Hollerith punch cards and contemporary technologies should be banned. This would mean no keyboards of course.
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/ibm ... tor-quot-2
Perhaps lets consider looking at societal issues as well as mental health issues.
Actually... not exactly. Then again, the Black Legend has falsely tainted the image of the S.I. beyond repair in English-speaking countries.fohat wrote: ↑I mostly agree with this, and one of the most staggering discrepancies of it is that much of it is done in the name of "Christianity" while what Jesus actually believed and taught is precisely the opposite.
Historical precedent? The Spanish Inquisition
True but a shotgun or a bolt action hunting rifle has a purpose other than shooting at squishy humans. They can be used to hunt animals for meat or protect yourself from predators ( you not always at the top fo the food chain when unarmed Mr Squishy Human).Mr.Nobody wrote: ↑ A calculator, a car or a keyboard is not made for killing, although you can use them to kill if you want to(No doubt a Model M is tough enough to smash some human heads ),whether these stuff will be used in a harmful way or not depends on who the user is, but guns are made for no other purposes but solely for killling, that's why they are called weapons which should be strictly regulated due to the obvious reasons, I do agree with you that societal factors and mental issues play a big role in violent behaviors.
Exactly, that's the root of the problem, living in a society that puts too much emphasis on competition and winning stresses people out, it kills the inner peace of soul and comfort of heart; violence among individuals and wars among nations alike are all originated from lack of inner peace. Usually it's the tortured who will become the torturer. Thanks for contributing such an in-depth point.Findecanor wrote: ↑I think the root problem is the cold, hard, individualistic culture in USA. It is partly to blame for the gun culture. It is also celebrating "winners" and shaming "losers". The latter are driven towards drug use to feel better by themselves - which is a factor in why USA has such a large drug problem.
Or .. they are driven to suicide.. but it is not a culture where suicide is accepted. So some of these proclaimed losers decide that they are "going to show them all" or "going out with a bang".
The solution would be to change the society into a warmer, more accepting society, and that can not be done in a day.
A reactionary movement that did just that was the hippie movement - it couldn't really have formed anywhere else.
Out of the hippie movement sprung Silicon Valley, and hippies reinvigorated Hollywood when it was in the slumps ... but that was then and those have been taken over by the main culture by now. Overall USA seems bound at destroying itself, and seems to be bound on destroying the world, now that it does not respect the Paris treaty.
Yes, there are perfect solutions for the gun-related issues, but goverment just won't do it, coz it'd cut some businessmen's interests, for example, in Texas they have lobbied the goverment and made Tesla banned, now people can't buy Tesla in Texas, people can go to the showrooms to see and have test drives but not allow to ask price or buy, what the hell...they've sold the idea that gun regulation impairs people's freedom but at the same time it's okay to deprive people of the freedom to buy electric cars directly from manufecturers? That's how ridiculous things can be. Maybe some time in the future, they will get selling drugs legallized and written into some Amendment to ensure some greedy businessmen can make more bloody money. People need to know this and struggle for their own good.andrewjoy wrote: ↑ True but a shotgun or a bolt action hunting rifle has a purpose other than shooting at squishy humans. They can be used to hunt animals for meat or protect yourself from predators ( you not always at the top fo the food chain when unarmed Mr Squishy Human).
The problem is how lax the laws are, and that people can get weapons that can be simple to mod to full auto. Some full auto sub machine guns / pistols are super cheap ( relatively) and easy to obtain and have no good reason for the public to have them.
So limited firearms are fine when need and well regulated, but US laws on them are crazy.
I like shooting firearms at a range or whatever, but for that in the US it should be you rent the gun and shoot it.Dealers and ranges can have the other more deadly weapons but only for range use and under strict regulation. Average billy bob joe on his farm only needs what he needs for working his land , a hunting rifle or a shotgun.
We had an equivalent of S.I in China, during the peirod of 1950s to 1970s, China underwent a series of absurd and davastating politial movements, called the Cultural Revolution, which was actually a comprehensive, inhumanly-crual, nation-wide witchhunt...only after that the Chinese communist party realized how terrible it can be, and they started to reform, fortunately, after efforts of decades, it's evolved into a unique hybrid system of Capitalsim and Socialism which works fine so far. When politicians make blunders, it's always people who pay the price. I guess it's safe to say that every nation has dark chapters in its history.depletedvespene wrote: ↑Actually... not exactly. Then again, the Black Legend has falsely tainted the image of the S.I. beyond repair in English-speaking countries.fohat wrote: ↑I mostly agree with this, and one of the most staggering discrepancies of it is that much of it is done in the name of "Christianity" while what Jesus actually believed and taught is precisely the opposite.
Historical precedent? The Spanish Inquisition
I changed my post to remove the "Spanish" part.depletedvespene wrote: ↑
The Black Legend has falsely tainted the image of the S.I. beyond repair in English-speaking countries.
Mr.Nobody wrote: ↑I've just watched this movie "Detroit"(2017), it tells a story about the civil unrest in Detroit in late 1960s. The movie addresses racism against African Americans, civil right violation, police brutality, using national guards to suppress people, ect., so the 60s isn't all about Beatles or Hippies. I wonder how dare some self-righteous westerners pick on us for what happened in 1989 on Tianmen square, while back in their democratic first world same shit happened as well. Of course, you have democracy and that makes all difference, obviously.