I have read a lot of reviews mentioning build quality issues in the Expert Mouse, and it feels a bit too baroque for my tastes.
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
I agree. I just can't see the appeal of thumbballs - other than button location.mr_a500 wrote:I don't know how anybody can use a thumb trackball. To me, the whole point of a trackball is the ability to relax your hand and use any finger to move the ball. You don't have to keep using the same finger. But on a thumb trackball you're forced to just use the thumb. (repetitive stress)
I use a CH Products DT225. The resolution is fairly low, but I have no problems using it on 2880x1800 with the tracking speed set pretty high. I find it smoother and more reliable than the Microspeed/CST.
Same. Been using a logitech thumb trackball and didn't like it, too much stress on the thumb to be honest. Switched to a CH Trackball Pro, previous name of the DT225. While it is lower resolution than an optical trackball, it is really smooth and comfortable.Symmetry wrote:I agree. I just can't see the appeal of thumbballs - other than button location.mr_a500 wrote:I don't know how anybody can use a thumb trackball. To me, the whole point of a trackball is the ability to relax your hand and use any finger to move the ball. You don't have to keep using the same finger. But on a thumb trackball you're forced to just use the thumb. (repetitive stress)
I use a CH Products DT225. The resolution is fairly low, but I have no problems using it on 2880x1800 with the tracking speed set pretty high. I find it smoother and more reliable than the Microspeed/CST.