Liking it so far
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
It's also water resistant, which helps when I bike through the rain (like yesterday
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
All I can say is that I own a Razr I and I would buy it again. What do you have against the Intel? It runs like a beast. And the most important part.. battery life. I can't kill it within one day. 4 hours of display on time is average.7bit wrote:Motorola Razr I runs nearly standard Android (what ever that means) and comes in a nice design, has a micro SD slot, but comes with intel inside instead of a Motorola 68k.
It's not really dead. The new phone from the makers of the Nokia N9's MeeGo has already been announced. They left Nokia in the meantime, founded their own company, and are working with Chinese manufacturers now:t!ng wrote: I tested the Nokia N9 with meego some days ago. Best OS in my opinion, but it is dead. No further support from Nokia. The community keeps it alive though. Had to send it back due to battery life.
S4 Nexus will be only available in the US and Samsung said they don't plan to bring it to Europe.huttala wrote:If it's not said yet I'd recommend the Galaxy S4 "Nexus edition" with vanilla android. It has microSD too.
If you can live without the MicroSD I'd take a Nexus 4, it's by far the smoothes phone out there.
Please scroll up a few posts where Peter posted a link about how to install alternative OSes on smart phones.t!ng wrote:You have an own OS? wow. What is it? How did you program it?
I would like to see the 7bit OS on an Iphone
I did not mean Debian I did mean an Android version without the bloatware from whomever I buy the phone.ne0phyte wrote:EDIT: What OS do you plan to install? The drivers you get are Android specific drivers and it's not that easy to just build Debian or Arch arm for a phone. You'll have to stick to Android.
Yes. There is a lot of proprietary hardware out there with limited or no support at all.7bit wrote:Are there hardware problems (ie unsupported harware) with some phones?
BUT be super careful to not get the latest revision which has very little developer support. You need to get the old "S2 i9100". Amazon listed the old model but sent out the new one for a long time.t!ng wrote:Then maybe the Samsung S2 is someting for you:
-you can put custom roms on it
-big community
-removable battery
-sd card slot
Cyanogenmod dropped the SGS2 because Samsung doesn't give away their code and drivers despite promising so in the past. For me as an SGS2 owner, I wish I would have bought a different phone :/t!ng wrote:Then maybe the Samsung S2 is someting for you:
-you can put custom roms on it
-big community
-removable battery
-sd card slot
At least Cyanogenmod supports the inferior i9100G fully, because its hardware is from Texas Instruments, and they release code and drivers for the community; thus Cyanogenmod can develop for the i9100G.ne0phyte wrote:BUT be super careful to not get the latest revision which has very little developer support. You need to get the old "S2 i9100". Amazon listed the old model but sent out the new one for a long time.
The new revision is slower and has a different cpu and chipset afaik.
If you want to add custom roms on your phone an Nexus 4 is what you want since all the drivers etc are open source the custom roms get a lot better. And the community is big, there is a lot of different roms that work great.7bit wrote:I did not mean Debian I did mean an Android version without the bloatware from whomever I buy the phone.ne0phyte wrote:EDIT: What OS do you plan to install? The drivers you get are Android specific drivers and it's not that easy to just build Debian or Arch arm for a phone. You'll have to stick to Android.
As far as I understand, the system can be configured or even modified if source files are present.
Are there hardware problems (ie unsupported harware) with some phones?
I think so, too. If you really want to use the SD card for data exchange, this is the better solution anyway, because you can store permanent apps or data in the internal flash memory and keep the SD card free of them.ne0phyte wrote: Yes. There is a lot of proprietary hardware out there with limited or no support at all.
If you really care about openness and being able to easily build your own ROM you should really take a Nexus device.
But Google got rid of memory extension slots as it makes it harder for App and OS developers. Internal memory is also faster than microSD cards. You can always buy a USB OTG adapter and connect a card reader or usb stick (OTG=On-The-Go; micro usb -> female usb a).
It might be easier to run an FTP client on your phone like I do ...Or just run a FTP server on your phone and mount that using curlftpfs like I do
you can reset flash counter and return to the stock rom7bit wrote:Motorola RAZR i: ~300 EUR / 8G / 32G microSD / no warranty / intel inside a motorola feels wrong
LG Nexus 4: ~390 EUR / 16G / nope / no warranty? / glass at front and back might break, hardware is fully supported by alternative OSes
Samsung Galaxy S III: ~390 EUR / 16G / 64G micro SD / no warranty / brand name looks wrong (SΛMSUNG)
Sony Xperia Z: ~490 EUR / 16G / 32G microSD / no warranty / IP57 except if water enters the phone, it is the user's fault
Samsung Galaxy S 4: 580 EUR / 16 G / 64G micro SD / no warranty / brand name looks wrong (SΛMSUNG)
I think I get the LG Nexus 4.
Does anybody know if the warranty is also lost when a proper OS installation is made?