let's call them the Firefliesdamorgue wrote:I am a keyboard on a desk...
..watch how I click.
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
let's call them the Firefliesdamorgue wrote:I am a keyboard on a desk...
..watch how I click.
That one looks better laid out than the couple of ideas I came up with (while staying to standard Round 5 caps).jdcarpe wrote:Right. It's not even in the design phase now, but I'm hoping to add a variant like this: (pay no attention to the legends, keys would be 100% programmable)
No way! If you want to do one, you won't see any complaints from me. Inara is super cool.matt3o wrote:unless you are vetoing it (which I would understand and respect) I'm still in for a tiny kb.
well let's join forces then, the tiny layout is all yours (you design it and we will obey)jdcarpe wrote:No way! If you want to do one, you won't see any complaints from me. Inara is super cool.matt3o wrote:unless you are vetoing it (which I would understand and respect) I'm still in for a tiny kb.
Muirium wrote:Don't worry about the Alps talk. MX is a certainty. We're just talking about extra possibilities.
I've got a big order of these guys so I'm a little invested in MX, too!
http://deskthority.net/wiki/Round_5
(New day, new chance to annoy Snoopy…)
If you want them, get on Round 5 soon. Closing time is coming and then production begins.
I agree with this guy, that keypad sure looks great. Lets name it since the others are named to give it a fair chance. Hands of blue?pasph wrote: and this
![]()
Not those again! You hound.snoopy wrote:Uhh, what a nice board. Don't you have a spacebra for it? Would love to see it complete.
If we choose a 65% -> 5 rows numpadMuirium wrote:@Pasph: is that 6th row really important to you? 5 rows would sit quite nicely on the desk next to one of my designs. But 6 rows isn't as well behaved except for people with horizontal function rows and zero spacing from their main block, Choc Mini style.
Also, we're going to need to USB dock these things together!
impressive project, thanks for the heads up, it's really hard to find interesting threads on GH due to the excessive noise. Indeed I lost your Blox project.mohitgarg wrote:This project looks good and can integrate with this project of mine on GH: http://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=48326.50
Blox is more PCB oriented and creating a modular system, however the findings can be used, and the PCB designs as well, so to satisfy the need for different layouts.
Sure, I can design the layout options for it. Should be exciting to see this go from design to build in quick succession.matt3o wrote:well let's join forces then, the tiny layout is all yours (you design it and we will obey)we could design the PCB for it and run the GB together with the others. But I totally understand if you want to run this on your own.
GH60 already covers a lot of layout. If you want to keep full alphanumeric and original staggering, it is hard to do better than that.matt3o wrote:ok, it seems there's no real interest in a 60%, so I guess I could remove it. Even though a kb that fits an existing case (as Muir suggests) would be nice.
It's smaller than 60%, no? You have to add 0,5 unit to your keycaps on the right or you will see the PCB, so what is the idea behind this River ? You only want to save 0.5 unit ?matt3o wrote:my layout (River) don't think is covered by GH60