Post a picture of your ideal keyboard layout!

[Muirium]

That's because we're ugly average blokes. Do the same with a fashion model, and you'll see the startling truth!

[zslane]

It's also why we don't like photos of ourselves. The asymmetrical version of ourselves that we see every day in the mirror is the reverse of what photographs capture, and so we see photos and typically don't like what we see (it looks "wrong" to us). Of course, the more symmetrical (i.e., beautiful) you are, the less apparent this phenomenon is.

[HzFaq]

Thinking of giving this a bash on one of the spare boards I've got kicking around...am I nuts? Did I get the stagger wrong? Thoughts?

stagger.png (9.65 KiB) Viewed 8969 times

[Muirium]

You got the stagger just fine.

But as for using it: good luck! It'd drive me fyvubg nrbyal!

[HzFaq]

Thanks, I couldn't see if it was right I'd been looking at it so long . And yeah, I'm sure it'll drive me nuts...that's the fun of alternative layouts though

I'll get something knocked up next week, and report back my findings. It might be one for the AUNK actually*...

edit - *Notice how I masterfully sold myself a PCB there without even realising it?

[stratokaster]

It'd drive me fyvubg nrbyal!

Clever

[Chyros]

You got the stagger just fine.

But as for using it: good luck! It'd drive me fyvubg nrbyal!

I laughed .

[iss]

Goals were arrows keys on a 60% and maximal keycap compatibility. Kinda wavered on that with the split backspace, but base kit+tsangan will cover this as long as the 1.75u Fn/right shift is included. Made the left mods 1.25u/1.5u to maintain symmetry- I played around with a 7u spacebar but it didn't look as nice. Thoughts?

[Parjánya]

Obsessively symmetrical.

keyboard-layout(4).jpg (104.02 KiB) Viewed 8842 times

[webwit]

Most of these keyboards got the spacing on the bottom row wrong. Eiiti Wada did extensive research here and got it right with the HHKB.

If you've got a HHKB, you can test this: place four fingers of each hand on the homerow. Move down your pinkies. They hit the middle of the small keys at the outside. Move them back, and now move down your ring fingers. They hit the middle of the keys next to the space bar. This is the only right spacing.

My only regret of the HHKB is that there's unused space on the bottom row, which I fixed with the qHACK layout!

[scottc]

My qHACK is just waiting for a plate and Teensy from the botmaster himself... I've got switches and caps sitting on the PCB, waiting!

[Parjánya]

I had just seen that layout, webwit! what is that thing on the middle of the bottom row, a scroll wheel?

I feel the bottom row is way underused... in this model M I just hit the spacebar either below the [<] key or next to the [c] key; that is more or less where I put the spacebars above; but I can't be sure it will work without really testing it.

[Chyros]

Obsessively symmetrical.

There is no notch on the left side of the return key. WHY IS THERE NO NOTCH ON THE LEFT SIDE OF THE RETURN KEYYYYY?!?!

[webwit]

It's a scroll wheel. I like scroll wheels, they feel much better than using some key (combination) to scroll through pages in order to ignore people's comments. And I really like the trackpoints on the older IBM M13's, they take away 80% of the mousing. And I really like the split space bar on the M15.

[Parjánya]

@Chyros: That bugs me also! but the site isn't prepared to that kind of madness : o ). Actually I managed to make it work rotating the keys 180º, but I couldn't fix the legends : /

@webwit: I like this idea a lot! now my keyboard just got a bit more complicated :'(

[Chyros]

@Chyros: That bugs me also! but the site isn't prepared to that kind of madness : o ). Actually I managed to make it work rotating the keys 180º, but I couldn't fix the legends : /

Also the backspace and right control don't have a mirroring notch. WHAT'S THE POINT?!?!


(:p)

Btw, it's only now I noticed the Space Cadet keys .

[Parjánya]

:'''(

keyboard-layout(5).jpg (102.73 KiB) Viewed 8796 times

[Chyros]

It's still not symmetrical enough. The keycap legends on the right half need to be mirror images of those on the left half! DO ITTT

[webwit]

You're preventing all the symmetrically obsessive a healthy night sleep.

[mastermachetier]

Okay so this layout came out of me wanting to build my own 65% as compact as possible with standard keycap sizes. I for some reason think that the 1.75 is a bit harder to find then the 1.5 for the right shift that also alows me to put an extra key in. In really i really use the right shift. I also an not quite sure what i would like on that extra button i have a menu there now , but I am thinking a delete might by nice that way i don't have to take my fingers off the home row to hit delete. Two versions with gap and without. Version without gap has 1.5 right shift.

Layout 1.5 shift

keyboard-layout.jpg (47.98 KiB) Viewed 8739 times

gap

keyboard-layout (4).jpg (48.57 KiB) Viewed 8739 times

This second one is kinda strange again i like the delete key somewhere I can hit without moving much and I use it a lot when I am in linux shells for work. Techinically I only really use the right side of the space , but I put two in for symmetry which i think overall looks better then 1st , but maybe a bit less functional. Also and correct me if I am wrong but you don't need stabilizers on the 2.25 so this whole keyboard could work no stabalizers.

2.25 space

keyboard-layout (1).jpg (48.24 KiB) Viewed 8739 times

This is my linearish layout a bit more compact by like .5 but this would certainly have no stabilizers. Make of it what you will .

MPLK

keyboard-layout (3).jpg (45.52 KiB) Viewed 8739 times

[Parjánya]

I like the 2.25 space one; not symmetrical, but discreet nonetheless. I think any key > 1.75 needs stabilizers.

[mastermachetier]

I like the 2.25 space one; not symmetrical, but discreet nonetheless. I think any key > 1.75 needs stabilizers.

I am a little torn between some of these for my next board.The 2.25 space one is wining right now but i kinda want to try linear and see how it feels. I might also just remove the row with the numbers and have that be accessible via a function key on the qwerty row

keyboard-layout.jpg (41.12 KiB) Viewed 8698 times

[Muirium]

You're preventing all the symmetrically obsessive a healthy night sleep.

My fingers are twitching, just looking at these. Quit disrupting my healthy midday sleep!

[jacobolus]

Folks who want something symmetrical should pay attention to the way you actually expect fingers to move.

Definitely not an ideal layout, but here’s an idea which fits in a 60% case:

If you've got a HHKB, you can test this: place four fingers of each hand on the homerow. Move down your pinkies. They hit the middle of the small keys at the outside. Move them back, and now move down your ring fingers. They hit the middle of the keys next to the space bar. This is the only right spacing.

This is still a dumb way to type in practice, and I suspect most folks with HHKBs use their thumbs. Reaching down two rows with the pinky/ring finger is extremely inefficient and not especially comfortable.

Better would be to have an extra-wide bottom row to make everything more comfortable for the thumbs to reach, and then add lower-height keys in front of a tall spacebar. Along the lines of https://www.flickr.com/photos/triplehaa ... 408828231/

... but without the keys to the sides of the main thumb keys being so silly long.

Or perhaps:

Eiiti Wada did extensive research here

Do you have a source for the specifics of this ring finger / pinky hypothesis? I’ve seen you claim the same thing before, but when I was searching I couldn’t find any source where Prof. Wada himself talked about that.

[ajx]

AHHKB

Arrows Happy Hacking Keyboard

[scottc]

That ZXC row stagger is going to kill you.

[HowlingSun]

First post
Grew up with ISO-Nordic and I'm stuck at work with them, so I have ordered a Pok3r with ISO-Uk for my home keyboard. I think that layout will be a lot better for me since I do not type Swedish much at home and I like it more for programming.

I hope to be able to program the Pok3r to the above layout.

[webwit]

Do you have a source for the specifics of this ring finger / pinky hypothesis? I’ve seen you claim the same thing before, but when I was searching I couldn’t find any source where Prof. Wada himself talked about that.

Sadly no. On the geekhack of yesteryear someone went deep into Wada's/PFU websites with archive.org, following references and all, and found some huge postscript document which I think was the basis for the PFU tech review Vol 3 No 1. It showed a large number of other keyboards and touch typing lines if I recall correctly.

[PeanutsAreYum]

I have made this layout recently for my planned first custom KB but seeing as I live in Australia the shipping cost and exchange rate meant I have had to scrap the project which is really sad.

I think this layout is absolutely fantastic because it is very similar to the FC660 but only consists of standard keys all in the correct row (eg. Right Shift is just Numpad 0).
So if you have blanks it is perfect (and I almost exclusively type on blanks).
Any blank set would perfectly fit this (If it includes a numpad).

The bracketed text represents where the keys came from

I wish I could make it a reality :(

wasd.jpg (68.57 KiB) Viewed 9110 times

[jacobolus]

found some huge postscript document which I think was the basis for the PFU tech review Vol 3 No 1. It showed a large number of other keyboards and touch typing lines if I recall correctly.

Do you mean this page?
http://www.pfu.fujitsu.com/hhkeyboard/k ... index.html