Help us get a Unicomp tenkeyless keyboard!
- sordna
- Location: USA
- Main keyboard: Kinesis Advantage LF / Dvorak layout
- Main mouse: Logitech M500
- Favorite switch: Cherry MX Red
- DT Pro Member: -
A Unicomp employee is asking the community to create cases in Unicomp's ticketing system to request the long awaited Unicomp Mini (Space Saving Keyboard)
Alternatively you can send email to support@pckeyboard.com
LET'S ALL MAKE THIS REQUEST FOR A TENKEYLESS UNICOMP CLICKY KEYBOARD !!!
Given enough participation, hopefully a keyboard like this will soon become a reality:
Alternatively you can send email to support@pckeyboard.com
LET'S ALL MAKE THIS REQUEST FOR A TENKEYLESS UNICOMP CLICKY KEYBOARD !!!
Given enough participation, hopefully a keyboard like this will soon become a reality:
Last edited by acfrazier on 08 Feb 2012, 03:39, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: permanent announcement until done.
Reason: permanent announcement until done.
- Spharx
- Location: Germany
- Main keyboard: Leoplod FC200R
- Main mouse: DeathAdder
- Favorite switch: MX Brown
- DT Pro Member: -
The layout that bugfix made would be superb because it would fit the needs of ansi and iso users.
- webwit
- Wild Duck
- Location: The Netherlands
- Main keyboard: Model F62
- Favorite switch: IBM beam spring
- DT Pro Member: 0000
- Contact:
Lol, Unicomp must be delirious about the unified demand. Post about a Unicomp SSK, get replies which state: Nice, but I want an ISO one. Nice but I want a 7bit one. Nice, but I want a HHKB one. Nice, but I want an ergo board with unstaggered keys. So this is how you don't get a Unicomp SSK keyboard.
- Ekaros
- Location: Finland,
- Main keyboard: FILCO MAJESTOUCH 105 MX Brown SW/FI
- Main mouse: Razer
- Favorite switch: MX Clear
- DT Pro Member: -
Layouts shouldn't be too hard for them if they are build like other BS-boards. Only difference is keycaps different placement of hammers. BS is quite different from MX boards as matrix can be same for all as stabilisers aren't mounted to plate or PCB.
What they need is likely only new case, matrix+plate+platisc-"plate". And maybe some reprogramming of old controllers. These do cost to develope and machine...
What they need is likely only new case, matrix+plate+platisc-"plate". And maybe some reprogramming of old controllers. These do cost to develope and machine...
- sordna
- Location: USA
- Main keyboard: Kinesis Advantage LF / Dvorak layout
- Main mouse: Logitech M500
- Favorite switch: Cherry MX Red
- DT Pro Member: -
The main hurdle is the case, molds are expensive. Webwit is right, for now we need to ask for a tenkeyless buckling spring keyboard, and not mention all these options and variations if we want to stand a chance in getting this done.
Also, if this keyboard has the usual unicomp pricing (around $80) and is readily available (not rare anymore) it wouldn't be as hard a decision to mod them ourselves.
Also, if this keyboard has the usual unicomp pricing (around $80) and is readily available (not rare anymore) it wouldn't be as hard a decision to mod them ourselves.
- litster
- Location: Washington State, USA
- Main keyboard: KMAC2, The Cheat
- Favorite switch: Brown, Topre, Red, BS
- DT Pro Member: -
I don't think a new Unicomp SSK model would make old IBM's SSKs cheaper. It certainly would not affect industrials your your other rare ones. The rare SSKs are expensive to buy and hard to find because they are collectibles. For one, the new one from Unicomp will most likely have Windows keys. And when you can buy one whenever you feel like it at a fixed retail price, the rush to get one is gone.
- webwit
- Wild Duck
- Location: The Netherlands
- Main keyboard: Model F62
- Favorite switch: IBM beam spring
- DT Pro Member: 0000
- Contact:
I'd love to have a space saving buckling keyboard with trackpoint.
-
- Location: London, UK
- Main keyboard: G80-3000
- Favorite switch: Cherry MX blue
- DT Pro Member: -
Everyone show your support for this! I want this to happen. I tried out a BS keyboard for the first time yesterday and it feels so good. I was originally thinking that a Topre would be my dream machine but not I am not so sure. A BS TKL would be perfect. If perfection can be improved upon I would have the pointing stick thing too as long as it works like my Thinkpad and not like the Dell implementation which is just rubbish. Please let Unicomp know that you want one!
- acfrazier
- Mad Scientist
- Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Main keyboard: Unicomp "Ultra Classic" PS/2
- Main mouse: Logitech G9
- Favorite switch: Capacitive Buckling Spring
- DT Pro Member: -
I have already been calling them a lot about this, but to show my faith in this (I REALLY WANT THIS but I doubt they will drop $250,000 on tooling) I am sticking it and moved it to Keyboards.
- bhtooefr
- Location: Newark, OH, USA
- Main keyboard: TEX Shinobi
- Main mouse: TrackPoint IV
- Favorite switch: IBM Selectric (not a switch, I know)
- DT Pro Member: 0056
- Contact:
So, the good thing is, Unicomp's architectures are very modular.
No need to complain about ANSI vs. ISO - the way the Model M-derived designs work, the tooling makes one design that is only defined as ANSI or ISO by where the hammers/springs and the inserts are placed. So, you'll get both designs.
If they do it on a modified version of the EnduraPro platform, you also get flexibility on whether it has a TrackPoint or not - Unicomp does, after all, have a blockoff plate to remove the buttons on an Ultra Classic.
Controller would be an issue that I forsee - they'd have to design a new one. However, I don't see any good way around that that doesn't increase labor costs significantly, no matter how they design the keyboard, unless they do away with lock LEDs.
No need to complain about ANSI vs. ISO - the way the Model M-derived designs work, the tooling makes one design that is only defined as ANSI or ISO by where the hammers/springs and the inserts are placed. So, you'll get both designs.
If they do it on a modified version of the EnduraPro platform, you also get flexibility on whether it has a TrackPoint or not - Unicomp does, after all, have a blockoff plate to remove the buttons on an Ultra Classic.
Controller would be an issue that I forsee - they'd have to design a new one. However, I don't see any good way around that that doesn't increase labor costs significantly, no matter how they design the keyboard, unless they do away with lock LEDs.
- 7bit
- Location: Berlin, DE
- Main keyboard: Tipro / IBM 3270 emulator
- Main mouse: Logitech granite for SGI
- Favorite switch: MX Lock
- DT Pro Member: 0001
Making Ansi/ISO, split up Back Space, split up right Shift should be no problem.webwit wrote:Lol, Unicomp must be delirious about the unified demand. Post about a Unicomp SSK, get replies which state: Nice, but I want an ISO one. Nice but I want a 7bit one. Nice, but I want a HHKB one. Nice, but I want an ergo board with unstaggered keys. So this is how you don't get a Unicomp SSK keyboard.
I'm not sure about the gaps between Alt and Control.
We just have to tell them they should fill these gaps, plus add the possibility for a switch into every of these possible positions.
Also, we want it in industrial grey with a square silver on black aluminium IBM label!
ps: Any chances they make a terminal tenkeyless?
- MegalomaniaC
- Location: Spain
- Main keyboard: IBM Model M
- Main mouse: Logitech G3
- Favorite switch: Buckling Spring
- DT Pro Member: -
I really dont mind if it is ISO or ANSI while its a SSK, but please lets make Unicomp build them! I would buy one instantly nomatter the price (well, if its cheaper than a common ssk, if not then im still getting the IBM one xD)
- sixty
- Gasbag Guru
- Main keyboard: DKSaver
- Favorite switch: Cherry MX Black
- DT Pro Member: 0060
You guys keep forgetting that the Model M, including the space saver is multilingual by design and will work with ISO/ANSI/JAPANESE JIS either way. ISO or ANSI is peanuts. The expensive part is the mold for the case parts
-
- Location: Sydney, Australia
- Main keyboard: 86UB-45
- Main mouse: G9x
- Favorite switch: Rubber dome
- DT Pro Member: -
Sounds like they might be equipped to produce a number of IBM models.Unicomp wrote: Do you need to replace your old IBM buckling spring keyboard?
Tell us the part number you are needing and we'll build you a new one, (with a Unicomp logo of course).
-
- Main keyboard: IBM Model F AT
- Main mouse: Logitech M310 (Wireless)
- Favorite switch: Buckling Spring
- DT Pro Member: -
Actually, it's nearly identical to the IBM Model M Space Saving keyboard, just as the Unicomp Classic is nearly identical to the IBM Model M, but then that's as it should be because Unicomp intentionally makes a replica of the IBM Model M and has carried on the Model M legacy for years now. Hence, if anyone's going to create a clone of the original Model M Space Saving keyboard, it should be them. Your comment is akin to labeling the Unicomp Classic pointless because it's the exact same size as an IBM Model M, which is entirely the point; to create a replica.Ekaros wrote:That one is bit pointless, near same size as full sized Filcos and such...1391401 wrote:Personally, I'd prefer one of these:
- MoarMAtt
- Location: Houston, Texas
- Main keyboard: Noppoo Choc Mini
- Main mouse: Logitech Revolution
- Favorite switch: Cherry Black
- DT Pro Member: -
- Contact:
Put in my email and they gave a prompt response that it was on "their wishlist" but couldnt confirm nor commit to it. CURSES!