So... you're a Nazi ? hahahahahha... um , hrrmm.. um.... hrrrmmmmm......................adhoc wrote: ↑No, I'm not talking about humanity with no artificial borders, I fully understand borders are necessary and understand their function, I'm not some new age hippy.
Regardless of borders, we're talking about human lives here.
And again, I'm no hippie, if it was up to me I'd make a selection of few dozen thousands of best samples (no health issues, no cancer, no AIDS, high IQ, all the quality genes), exterminate the rest (this would obviously mean sacrificing myself in the process - but I would!) and carry on humanity in real, full glory. Because it would be logical and it would be best for humanity as a species. BUT we're not doing that, so killing people for no fucking reason is stupid.
Well, eugenics isn't fundamentally bad.. it's like GMO foods really, we're trying to evolve faster than natural selection..
The issue has always been the difficulty in selecting that set of Genes to grow from.. very hard to say for sure if it will succeed..
But more than anything else.. I don't think it's necessary.
Look at the population projections of any developed nations. The fertility rate will always fall below 2.0 per female human..
This means that the population once basic needs and safety is met, will naturally trim its unnecessary leaves..
So, there's no need to FORCE this process to happen tomorrow with a few thousand people, because the trimming/ culling (quite morbid) haha, happens on its own..