- IMG_7654.JPG (545.11 KiB) Viewed 23910 times
Does anyone have issues posting picture attachments?
- matt3o
- -[°_°]-
- Location: Italy
- Main keyboard: WhiteFox
- Main mouse: Anywhere MX
- Favorite switch: Anything, really
- DT Pro Member: 0030
- Contact:
Image test
- depletedvespene
- Location: Chile
- Main keyboard: IBM Model F122
- Main mouse: Logitech G700s
- Favorite switch: buckling spring
- DT Pro Member: 0224
- Contact:
Lemme see...
Seems fine.
Seems fine.
- sharktastica
- Location: Wales
- Main keyboard: '86 IBM F Bigfoot + '96 IBM M50
- Main mouse: Logitech MX Revolution
- Favorite switch: Cap B/S, BOX Navy
- Contact:
All good from my end.
And I can see the photo you posted.- depletedvespene
- Location: Chile
- Main keyboard: IBM Model F122
- Main mouse: Logitech G700s
- Favorite switch: buckling spring
- DT Pro Member: 0224
- Contact:
Let's try a random PNG now, instead of JPEGs....
?!
EDIT: animated GIF.
La la la.
?!
EDIT: animated GIF.
La la la.
- depletedvespene
- Location: Chile
- Main keyboard: IBM Model F122
- Main mouse: Logitech G700s
- Favorite switch: buckling spring
- DT Pro Member: 0224
- Contact:
And a gratuituous link to some video on YouTube, just because.
- matt3o
- -[°_°]-
- Location: Italy
- Main keyboard: WhiteFox
- Main mouse: Anywhere MX
- Favorite switch: Anything, really
- DT Pro Member: 0030
- Contact:
thanks guys!
-
- Location: United Kingdom
- Main keyboard: Modded IBM Model F AT
- Main mouse: Mionix Naos 8200
- Favorite switch: Capacitive Buckling Springs
- DT Pro Member: -
- Contact:
I had an issue with posting pictures a few days ago. what happend was I posted a picture and it flipped sideways when I posted it even though the picture was the right way around when taken. The problem has not happend again when I posted a picture recently.
- webwit
- Wild Duck
- Location: The Netherlands
- Main keyboard: Model F62
- Favorite switch: IBM beam spring
- DT Pro Member: 0000
- Contact:
That's just a problem with how phones handle orientation while the actual image is sideways.
- ddrfraser1
- Location: United States
- Main keyboard: Changes weekly
- Main mouse: MX MASTER
- Favorite switch: Lubed 55g BKE Redux Domes
- Contact:
Yeah, DT hates phones. Especially if it’s in a pm
- webwit
- Wild Duck
- Location: The Netherlands
- Main keyboard: Model F62
- Favorite switch: IBM beam spring
- DT Pro Member: 0000
- Contact:
DT has nothing to do with it. Phones hate the world outside phones, and may save photos in a retarded way. E.g. you could make a horizontal picture, and instead of saving it as a horizontal picture (duh) it saves it as a vertical one with some exif or whatever data "got you, it's really 90% ccw". Then when exporting it throws its shit over the wall, and good luck to the rest of the world with that.
- webwit
- Wild Duck
- Location: The Netherlands
- Main keyboard: Model F62
- Favorite switch: IBM beam spring
- DT Pro Member: 0000
- Contact:
In any case, either phones should fix it when exporting, or desktop OS or browsers should fix it. But not all the websites in the world, which would have to post-process photos and rotate stuff.
- Muirium
- µ
- Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
- Main keyboard: HHKB Type-S with Bluetooth by Hasu
- Main mouse: Apple Magic Mouse
- Favorite switch: Gotta Try 'Em All
- DT Pro Member: µ
Yes. All my images are hosted here. There’s a button in the UI somewhere to attach images. Then you press the insert inline button next to each one to have them in specific places in your post.
Otherwise
They
Just
Kinda
Sit
Down
Here
Otherwise
They
Just
Kinda
Sit
Down
Here
-
- Location: Stockholm, Sweden
- DT Pro Member: 0011
Embedded images in HTML documents are not rotated according to the EXIF tag, in any browser.
The "width" and "height" from the image's header are used as is. AFAIK, that is because of the HTML specification says so.
Before posting an image, open it in a paint program. If the program asks you if image should be rotated, then do so and save the image.
I open all my images in Gimp anyway before posting, also to crop it, adjust colour and exposure if necessary and scale down to a more web-friendly size (posting a super-grainy 4K×3K picture would be a waste of bandwidth and storage on the server and is inconsiderate to everyone).
- ddrfraser1
- Location: United States
- Main keyboard: Changes weekly
- Main mouse: MX MASTER
- Favorite switch: Lubed 55g BKE Redux Domes
- Contact:
Mmm hmm, mmm hmm, I understand some of these words.
- webwit
- Wild Duck
- Location: The Netherlands
- Main keyboard: Model F62
- Favorite switch: IBM beam spring
- DT Pro Member: 0000
- Contact:
Of course, the browser could just use the rotation from EXIF and present it to the HTML engine running according to the specs in the "right" dimensions like nothing happened.Findecanor wrote: ↑13 May 2020, 18:21Embedded images in HTML documents are not rotated according to the EXIF tag, in any browser.
The "width" and "height" from the image's header are used as is. AFAIK, that is because of the HTML specification says so
There are probably a million discussions about this on the Internet, with people who know much better. The introduction of phones with different orientations really created this problem, and phones throwing this problem over the wall, like "hey it's your problem" and browsers saying like "nope, it's your problem". Still lame that this is still a problem after all this time with both parties still waving their lazy cocks around. This is not exactly like putting a person on the moon.