Thank you for your response, I really appreciate it. I thought the internals looked awfully similar. Glad to know the shafts and bearings can be swapped if necessary.Archie wrote: ↑18 Jun 2020, 01:34Having both, I'd say CH is much more usable than ITAC on modern systems. Of course I keep it in doubled resolution mode, but even native one outperforms ITAC's 192 PPR.
Mechanically they're nearly identical: exactly the same type of bearings & shaft diameter, but CH have slightly bigger ball and better arrangement of buttons. No integral wrist rest, though.
If you need high-resolution trackball with ball bearings, maybe it's worth to try semi-DIY derivative of defunct Microsoft Explorer trackball, as all the factory-made units still in production today are AFAIK low-resolution (by modern standards) devices.
The DT225 should be just what I'm looking for then. I see one locally for a reasonable price with a DB9 serial connector. I'll have to get a serial to USB cable and bring a laptop to demo it. Hopefully the DT225 will play nice with a converter cable.
The Ploopy looks like a nice option indeed but the price is a bit rich for me at the moment and I'm not sold on the shape, though I'd still like to try it some day.