arkanoid wrote: 05 Feb 2021, 12:16 I recently sorted out my storage and had a chance to take the photos of 38th SSK!Spoiler:
May I ask what this is? Looks like it's not kinda M-cut mod result neither normal SSK?
Nice! The date looked familiar, so I flipped mine over... my SSK was built on the same day! March 3, 1993. But our ID numbers are 1188 apart - they sure made a lot of them that day for such a rare keyboard! (or maybe regular Model M's shared the same number space... or they produced big runs of SSKs on certain days...)headphone_jack wrote: 10 Feb 2021, 23:26 After many months of eBay stalking, I finally nabbed an SSK for a decent price. Can't wait for it to get here and join the club!
s-l1600.jpg
That is too much clout dude my NIB SSK's can't even compete.Muramasa wrote: 08 Mar 2021, 01:20 Finally I can formally join the SSK club! Ikea Alex drawers make perfect SSK storage!
How's the build quality? Also the legends for the windows key and context menu looks off. Maybe it's just me. I do like the lock lights though.sharktastica wrote: 08 Mar 2021, 17:55 Whilst certainly not as valuable as a Mopar, I'll take the distinction of posting the first Mini M (well, prototype of) nu SSK on this thread.
It's pretty good. This is a prototype keyboard and the right Windows key alignment is a known issue that's already been fixed (chyros' example, which is a slightly later prototype, doesn't have the same issue). Tbh, I hadn't noticed the context key - it's not bad enough to be worth a fuss.Redmaus wrote: 08 Mar 2021, 19:19 How's the build quality? Also the legends for the windows key and context menu looks off. Maybe it's just me. I do like the lock lights though.
Probably sent them for review
Unicomp approached me to critically review the Mini M to find any outstanding issues and review from my perspective.
You mean help them promote their forthcoming product. If they wanted substantial input, they’d ask earlier! I mean, that bottom row is an unforced error. The mods look like Unicomp approached a random number generator for its ideas…sharktastica wrote: 10 Mar 2021, 02:44Unicomp approached me to critically review the Mini M to find any outstanding issues and review from my perspective.
I couldn't agree more. Also don't know why they didn't make this like ten years ago.Muirium wrote: 10 Mar 2021, 17:24 Same. There's natural symmetry in putting them above the 3 keys wide "navigation sixpack", instead of over the last group of 4 function keys. They look a bit daft pulled in like they are.
Geez dude, no need to be a jerk about it. From sharks other comments he helped identify some bugs in the anti ghost code at extreme high rollover among other things. Sounds like standard pre-release/beta testing to me.Muirium wrote: 10 Mar 2021, 09:12You mean help them promote their forthcoming product. If they wanted substantial input, they’d ask earlier! I mean, that bottom row is an unforced error. The mods look like Unicomp approached a random number generator for its ideas…sharktastica wrote: 10 Mar 2021, 02:44Unicomp approached me to critically review the Mini M to find any outstanding issues and review from my perspective.
Thanks! Very much, this. Due to the 'clunky' nature of a Model M barrel plate design, they don't really have a lot of options without sinking money into a new mould or modified membrane when people demand change.stormcrash wrote: 11 Mar 2021, 05:18 Geez dude, no need to be a jerk about it. From sharks other comments he helped identify some bugs in the anti ghost code at extreme high rollover among other things. Sounds like standard pre-release/beta testing to me.
My goodness Unicomp will never please people no matter what they do with the bottom row. I do kind of wish they had left Alt on the right 1.5 key, but after years of hearing people complain about the "non standard" key order people still aren't happy when they make a board with it.
They've always put their business as an OEM for other companies first, which is common knowledge. GE wouldn't want an SSK since it needs a lot of custom keys on a dedicated numpad and Affirmative wouldn't want an SSK since they resell M122s for terminal emulation. Hopefully, their focus may change in the future (as it seems to be) but I don't blame them for putting their cash cow first.
A company behaving in a fiscally responsible manner? The gall some people have...
clickykeyboards wrote: 12 Mar 2021, 15:54 Photos of what the 3 LEDs would look like on an 84-key SSK.
Thanks for the excellent visual aid!clickykeyboards wrote: 12 Mar 2021, 15:54 Photos of what the 3 LEDs would look like on an 84-key SSK.
Pictured are 5mm LEDs from a vintage 1390131 model M.
Certainly 3mm or 1.8mm LEDs could be used to fit the plastic case mounting constraints.