The Viola D'amore is like a 12 String guitar, really like the sound
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
@Stabilized: I always feel like the harpsichord drags the other instruments down with its jingling! I couldn't bear a whole solo
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
I do agree with your points, but I do think that Mozart's image was inflated by his fame; he always was pushed by his musical parents. When he got older he started to compose by commission, creating music that was very constrained to the style at the time, was quite superficial, imo. His final piece (Requiem), I think, was the most complex and interesting, but I still wouldn't pay to see it.mr_a500 wrote: (Oh good - a classical discussion...)
"Most brilliant" would also depend on the era. Composers learned based on what had come before them and they were constrained by the "fashion" of their times. Mozart was certainly brilliant, but I don't like most of his works because of the style of his era - the "Classical" era - mostly major keys, speed/volume/mood changes, linear. I consider the previous Baroque period to be superior because it was more complex, multi-layered and keeping mood/speed/volume consistent throughout the piece.
If Mozart were born 75 years earlier, then we could better compare Mozart with Bach (imagine the awesome Baroque Mozart could have done). It's also a bit of a "popularity contest". There are amazing works by lesser known composers. Also, there are many lost compositions, destroyed by war or lost over the centuries. Possibly the real "most brilliant musician ever" was some unknown, lost to history. It's fascinating to think about.
This is a big claim, and I find it to be quite untrue. I believe there are definite trends in modern music, but I think it would be America who is the most forward thinking at the moment.mr_a500 wrote: I always think that modern musicians could certainly learn from classical music - especially multi-layered Baroque. I think that's why I can tolerate some European "modern" music - because they, unlike American "artists" (I hate that word applied to music), are more often classically trained.
Of course, Mozart is way over hyped. That's what I was saying about it being a "popularity contest". I wasn't saying he was the best, but that you could compare better if he was from the same era as Bach.Stabilized wrote: I do agree with your points, but I do think that Mozart's image was inflated by his fame; he always was pushed by his musical parents. When he got older he started to compose by commission, creating music that was very constrained to the style at the time, was quite superficial, imo. His final piece (Requiem), I think, was the most complex and interesting, but I still wouldn't pay to see it.
When I said "modern" I was talking about "popular" music. There is a desperate need of classical music education among American popular musicians. (who like to call themselves "artists")Stabilized wrote: This is a big claim, and I find it to be quite untrue. I believe there are definite trends in modern music, but I think it would be America who is the most forward thinking at the moment.
Take composers like George Crumb, Nico Muhly, and John Adams; they are really forward thinking in their approach to the classical idioms (i.e. the symphony, opera).
No denying that there is a lot of very active and influential European composers, but I do find the whole concert hall classical music — and perhaps this tradition steeped term of classical music — ultimately, a bit boring!
Give me the timbres and texture of something like Monty Adkins new album, Borderlands
My mistake, I was agreeing with you, but I did make it sound like I was disagreeing
I used some hyperbole while saying that American composers now are the most forward thinking, I just find it a bit frustrating the extent to which the historical genre of 'classical music' is cemented in the minds of students in Europe (I being one of them for a while). It just seems to reek a bit too much of old fashioned elitism.mr_a500 wrote: When I said "modern" I was talking about "popular" music. There is a desperate need of classical music education among American popular musicians. (who like to call themselves "artists")
I don't know much about modern "serious" composers - besides movie music composers (sadly all my favourites are now dead). You're probably right.
bumpvsev wrote: http://phauneradio.com/ frenchie one but smoother than this other one
http://compound-eye.org/
Anyway often switching between these two !
edit: bump; did someone try those ,,can make some review(turn) ?
Building landing strips for gay Martians, duh! (Say, have you seen my burrow owl?)