Ah, I'm a sucker for Arthur C. Clarke and this was one I barely remembered. Thanks for the link.
Part 2 of 3 stars this guy, who's bringing serious technology to UFO footage analysis.
![Screen Shot 2013-12-17 at 09.14.43 pm.jpg](./download/file.php?id=10469&sid=6d985eabd8f8108d27603635045ec0c0)
- Screen Shot 2013-12-17 at 09.14.43 pm.jpg (420.47 KiB) Viewed 3551 times
Bet those are double shots.
![Screen Shot 2013-12-17 at 09.14.24 pm.jpg](./download/file.php?id=10468&sid=6d985eabd8f8108d27603635045ec0c0)
- Screen Shot 2013-12-17 at 09.14.24 pm.jpg (361.97 KiB) Viewed 3551 times
Damn it, don't make me want a grey numpad in Round 5!
Overall, it's the usual confusing affair of all UFO documentaries from back in the day before we all carried cameras as a matter of routine and sightings fell out of fashion. Namely: shaky shaky shaAaAaAaAakey reels of unidentifiable blobs you couldn't tell from a streetlight, backed with earnest descriptions from those present at the time. Then tales of close encounters from delightfully rustic folk (the Scottish park ranger's incident is still told here from time to time, and happened right down the road from where I lived back then, barely months old…) and closing with a monologue from Clarke where he politely refutes everything shown until that point. Including a memorable line bemoaning the absence of "fossilised transistor radios".
When they come, we'll know about it. Indeed. Funny bloody aliens, picking on simpletons without a way to prove it.