Muirium wrote: Here's a thought experiment. Imagine a keyboard so vast that you never had to press any chords at all. There's two number rows, so you can hit !@#$ etc. without Shift. And there's a whole second alpha block just for UPPER CASE ALL BY ITSELF.
Love it!
![Evil Geek :evilgeek:](./images/smilies/icon_evil_geek.gif)
..joking aside, I would love to see a serious discussion about a Better Way(tm) that involves a bit of outside-the-box thinking. If you had never seen an keyboard before and you had to invent a widely usable input device from scratch, how would you do it? With no prior notion of a keyboard, but knowing what you know about computers, about desk space, ergonomy, hand & finger dexterity, the importance of tactile feedback, the frequency distribution of characters in English text, etc.
I'm really asking.
Consider for example that that the 'z' and 'q' keys probably see less use than the Ctrl+v chord. Or that, for some of us, the key combo "colon-w-q" has a higher frequency than all the above-the-numbers symbols put together.
What if you designed a keyboard based on the
California Job Case? Or what if you designed it with a nod to the learnings from 100-year-old
stenotype tech?
What if the ten most used chords simply replaced your F-row? Who says a key has to be depressed to actuate, or that a switch can't have multiple actuation levels with different semantics?
Am I advocating a departure from everything that is holy? Throwing away your Cherries, Alps and Topres? Of course not. But given that this is one of the few communities in the world who spends all their time thinking about keyboards and disassembling keyboards and sometimes even designing PCBs and cases for keyboards -- if anyone is ever going to come up with a better mouse trap, it's a fair bet it'll be someone with a DT account.