snuci wrote: From Techno Trousers response, I guess this was discussed in the mammoth MF thread? No disrespect but I gave up on trying to keep track of what was going on in that thread long ago.
If I came across the wrong way, apologies on my part... I love that someone actually bright is fighting this fight too. Shows there is need and we all appreciate that others are taking stabs at it.
That MF thread is ridiculous in length, I agree. I am not sure if/how to split it up though. We have a following of "loyals to the cause" that make AWESOME posts that wouldn't be seen by those that need to, but unless someone is really actively following it, the thread is impossible to keep up with. The good/bad of online social fluff. Our problem is that we are trying to accomplish too much at too quick of a pace I think (blame OCD).
The real hiccup that brought us to the a GRINDING halt on the adapter was the Capslock key. It just can't work if we are wanting a way to get a uniform board of MX on BS (regardless of profile height). All other keys could be compensated for with adapters and modified springs, but that one... Why IBM did you offset that stem?!? No really... WHY?!?
We decided to wait until could make a full switch and board layout (MF^2) that at least components of the switch could act as forward and backward compatible. Unfortunately... the Cherry adapter wouldn't be one. If we do it right going forward, we can get away with 2 molds. Right now, assuming Capslock worked, it would require 7 for a 101+ key. The crappy reality of this being a break-even hobby (little funding).