What was your point you moron.silat wrote:LOL now you are being funny. By funny I mean I am finally laughing at you.
You break your toys then run away from gh because gh will not bow down to you. Then you announce that you are going to OCN and on your way out the door leave a nasty note on the wiki.
And you run to OCN?
You trashed OCN regularly when at gh.
Yea, that makes perfect sense.
Then you have the utter gall to say that you have a rule and it is "#1 be polite to the SubForum Mod", all the while trashing the mods/members at gh for no reason. When I say trashing that is the kindest word I can come up with as to your childish behavior.
Oh yeah the reason you behave this way is because you are a spoiled rotten child that screams and cries when they do not get their way.
You trashed your reputation at gh by calling mods and other members of the forums names and doing your best (not good enough by the way) to inflict harm on gh.
Then you whined and screamed like petulant child when no one would bow down to you. (repeated for effect)
Yep you are pretty laughable right now.
The great and powerful ripster cant comprehend my post? You are a spoiled little bitch and when you couldnt misbehave as you wanted then you quit like a coward does by abusing the forums. Is that clear enough? Do you have kids? I am sure they can explain it to you if it is to complicated for you.ripster wrote:I'll start on this fucking moron then.
What was your point you moron.silat wrote:LOL now you are being funny. By funny I mean I am finally laughing at you.
You break your toys then run away from gh because gh will not bow down to you. Then you announce that you are going to OCN and on your way out the door leave a nasty note on the wiki.
And you run to OCN?
You trashed OCN regularly when at gh.
Yea, that makes perfect sense.
Then you have the utter gall to say that you have a rule and it is "#1 be polite to the SubForum Mod", all the while trashing the mods/members at gh for no reason. When I say trashing that is the kindest word I can come up with as to your childish behavior.
Oh yeah the reason you behave this way is because you are a spoiled rotten child that screams and cries when they do not get their way.
You trashed your reputation at gh by calling mods and other members of the forums names and doing your best (not good enough by the way) to inflict harm on gh.
Then you whined and screamed like petulant child when no one would bow down to you. (repeated for effect)
Yep you are pretty laughable right now.
ripster wrote:Because I've spent ALL DAY tormenting 18 year old moderators masturbating to their new duties!
If it was just me I'd have to torment myself.
Now THAT is mean.ripster wrote:.....LOL - I have the uberRare Deck key set Silat is looking for.
Silat - you can't have it.
Interesting. Now I'm either in the early stages of Alzheimer's, suck at the Internet, or I'm just a lazy bastard because I didn't read every thread in every user's sub-forum before reading this one. No need for the long list of insults, I simply said I hadn't heard of it before...I especially like the Google-fu dig from the guy who can't figure out Moogle kits, which are now in their THIRD round...off wrote:For all you with either rusty memory, crappy google-fu, or buckets of lazyness: behold. The Light.
No hard feelings bro, just take it easy on the insults, especially when referencing a thread from an obscure sub-forum that most people, especially here, probably don't read. 
Dude...ease up. I said "no hard feelings" before but now you're pushing it. I never asked you or anybody else to tell me what it was, so your reply to me was unwarranted, as were your comments. I only made a comment that I hadn't heard of it before. Jeez, did somebody drop a deuce in your Wheaties this morning or what? Take a break from the internet and chill out...off wrote:real cute. I declined to respond to your last message in the moogle thread because you hadn't bothered reading what you replied to, or some other malfunction; seriously, reread that and the context before, what you advised dirge, then grasp why I've said what I've said there, and why I have kept asking questions.
And obscure forum? It's this forums mother and grandfather.
Also, it's been mentioned in this thread 5 times, perhaps a search would enlighten. "the Light" is not term used often on GH out of context I presume.
Lastly, calling people lazy is not an insult in this day and age. Rusty neither. I am both.
And google sucks balls these days, so no insult in not being friends with him anymore.
Should we take this outside? Personally, I'd rather you'd just read. Espescially over at moogley.gimpster wrote:Dude...ease up. I said "no hard feelings" before but now you're pushing it. I never asked you or anybody else to tell me what it was, so your reply to me was unwarranted, as were your comments. I only made a comment that I hadn't heard of it before. Jeez, did somebody drop a deuce in your Wheaties this morning or what? Take a break from the internet and chill out...
As to your "rebuttal"...geekhack is not obscure, I never said that it was...I said that TheProfosist's sub-forum is obscure, and it is. Also, maybe you need yourself a dictionary, there's a free one here: http://dictionary.com, but calling someone lazy, rusty, or incapable of helping themselves is definitely an insult. And I'm none of them. I simply didn't care to find out more about it at this time, which is why I never asked you or anyone else to give me more information. You volunteered that on your own, along with your insults. So, if we're done here, maybe we can get back to Phantom talk.
Well, let's see, your reply was directly after mine, you didn't quote any other reply, and none of the other replies between dirge's mention of "the light" and my comment about "the light" even mentioned "the light". So I don't know who else you could have been replying to, other than the voices in your head. Either way, no need to take this outside, I'm done with you. You've made my "dead to me" list. I tried to be helpful to you, I tried to bury the hatchet, not once, but twice, but you are impossible, and you don't know how to let things go.off wrote:Should we take this outside? Personally, I'd rather you'd just read. Espescially over at moogley.
I did not respond to you, only after you attacked me I did.
And yes, this morning, and yesterday, there was you that I tried to respond to in a way that you could not misunderstand; failing everytime. That does take it's toll.
TLDR; we don't get along it appears. /OT
gimpster wrote:I haven't heard of "the light" but I would love to see us take a stab at our own 60% or 75% board.
Off, you are off. Your reply to gimpster was not polite, no matter how you read it. And I read the moogle kit thread. gimpster tried hard to provide links to pictures and and long explanations to your questions. If people trying to help you by answering your questions, you don't tell them to re-read your question if you don't understand their answers and go on questioning their implications in their answers. If there is *any* implication, it is in your reply to gimpster's, implying he has no memory, suck at internet search, and that he is lazy.off wrote:For all you with either rusty memory, crappy google-fu, or buckets of lazyness: behold. The Light.
Now I wasn't trying to rain on your parade, and was grinning ear to ear while watching that vid; where I was coming from was that my experiences with heatshrink don't allow for it to hold on very tight to any cable at all, let alone loose cablesleaving like that, and just the addition of an O-ring would in my world not easily make that different, hence my concern.litster wrote:Frankly, I was annoyed by your comments questioning how you "don't see how it could hold a cable VERY well at all.." And when I posted the picture, you suggested the picture was taken while "it's lying on the floor instead of hanging from your hand?" Noticed I didn't have any text in my video post? I did, But I deleted it. I could have written: "For all you with either inability to understand physics, crappy shrinkwrap-fu, or just being a plain unbeliever: behold. Yank this!"
Seeing how at least both of you felt I replied directly to gimpster, I probably have to take a different approach to posting here in general.litster wrote:Off, you are off. Your reply to gimpster was not polite, no matter how you read it.off wrote:For all you with either rusty memory, crappy google-fu, or buckets of lazyness: behold. The Light.
I fixed that to what I can now agree on. I replied ticked-off by his dig at my questions regarding what he meant, misrepresenting those to mean that I wondered what a moogle kit was. That I should have let slide and responded to his answers politely in that thread.litster wrote:Off, you are off. Your reply to gimpster was not polite, no matter how you read it.off wrote:real cute. I declined to respond to your last message in the moogle thread because you hadn't bothered reading what you replied to, or some other malfunction; seriously, reread that and the context before, what you advised dirge, then grasp why I've said what I've said there, and why I have kept asking questions.gimpster wrote:Interesting. Now I'm either in the early stages of Alzheimer's, suck at the Internet, or I'm just a lazy bastard because I didn't read every thread in every user's sub-forum before reading this one. No need for the long list of insults, I simply said I hadn't heard of it before...I especially like the Google-fu dig from the guy who can't figure out Moogle kits, which are now in their THIRD round...
And obscure forum? It's this forums mother and grandfather.
Also, it's been mentioned in this thread 5 times, perhaps a search would enlighten. "the Light" is not term used often on GH out of context I presume.
Lastly, calling people lazy is not an insult in this day and age. Rusty neither. I am both.
And google sucks balls these days, so no insult in not being friends with him anymore.
And for that I am grateful. Perhaps a sense of entitlement (to the truth/answered questions) got me to forget the effort he put in, despite the confusion the answers sow. That I apologise for.litster wrote:And I read the moogle kit thread. gimpster tried hard to provide links to pictures and long explanations to your questions.
'His implications' vs 'things implied by what he said'..litster wrote:If people trying to help you by answering your questions, you don't tell them to re-read your question if you don't understand their answers and go on questioning their implications in their answers. If there is *any* implication, it is in your reply to gimpster's,
That, was not an attack, it was a jab. Honestly meant in a friendly joking fashion.:litster wrote:implying he has no memory, suck at internet search, and that he is lazy.
I appreciate the apology. I don't feel that grudges help small communities like this, so let's just call it a "breakdown in translation" and carry on. I know how the Internet muddles intended meanings, which is why I try to give people the benefit of the doubt. So, in the interest of trans-Atlantic peace-making, I officially promote you off my "Dead to Me" list and back to my "On Notice" list.off wrote:TLDR; truth is relative. joke starts war. don't mix conversations through topics. bring your own salt/sambal. sorry&thanks gimp.
I wouldn't take that if I were you. 
Ya, I'd already unfoe'd you somewhere this night; mostly for ease of use though, had to be able to quickly read back all posts in context without having to click the bloody pop open buttons (and thereby closing the others automatically).gimpster wrote:I appreciate the apology. I don't feel that grudges help small communities like this, so let's just call it a "breakdown in translation" and carry on. I know how the Internet muddles intended meanings, which is why I try to give people the benefit of the doubt. So, in the interest of trans-Atlantic peace-making, I officially promote you off my "Dead to Me" list and back to my "On Notice" list.off wrote:TLDR; truth is relative. joke starts war. don't mix conversations through topics. bring your own salt/sambal. sorry&thanks gimp.
Sorry for the late reply..ripster wrote:I'll start on this fucking moron then.
What was your point you moron.silat wrote:LOL now you are being funny. By funny I mean I am finally laughing at you.
You break your toys then run away from gh because gh will not bow down to you. Then you announce that you are going to OCN and on your way out the door leave a nasty note on the wiki.
And you run to OCN?
You trashed OCN regularly when at gh.
Yea, that makes perfect sense.
Then you have the utter gall to say that you have a rule and it is "#1 be polite to the SubForum Mod", all the while trashing the mods/members at gh for no reason. When I say trashing that is the kindest word I can come up with as to your childish behavior.
Oh yeah the reason you behave this way is because you are a spoiled rotten child that screams and cries when they do not get their way.
You trashed your reputation at gh by calling mods and other members of the forums names and doing your best (not good enough by the way) to inflict harm on gh.
Then you whined and screamed like petulant child when no one would bow down to you. (repeated for effect)
Yep you are pretty laughable right now.
