What do "M" and "F" stand for?

User avatar
digital_matthew

13 Dec 2018, 17:05

Hey everyone. I was just curious as to what the "M" and "F" represent for IBM keyboard model designations. (I'm too lazy to do the research, so I thought I'd just ask.) Thanks!

User avatar
depletedvespene

13 Dec 2018, 17:12

I'm biting my tongue here... :mrgreen:

Engicoder

13 Dec 2018, 17:20

It's simply the IBM designation for the technology used for the line of keyboards.

User avatar
fohat
Elder Messenger

13 Dec 2018, 17:30

Fine and Mediocre

User avatar
Muirium
µ

13 Dec 2018, 18:50

Mother and her lover.

Hearsay has it that M is for Membrane, which makes sense. Perhaps to much sense to be true! F is less clear. Flipper? Surely not. But then again, it kinda wants to be so…

andrewjoy

13 Dec 2018, 18:59

Mediocre and Fucking Awesome

User avatar
TheInverseKey

13 Dec 2018, 19:01

Meh and Fantastic

User avatar
Darkshado

14 Dec 2018, 05:30

I recall reading Farad somewhere, which is the unit of capacitance; no idea how legitimate that claim was.

User avatar
kbdfr
The Tiproman

14 Dec 2018, 08:30

Perhaps they were named that for the same reason Chanel N° 5 got its name :mrgreen:

Image

(Best fragrance ever, by the way.)

User avatar
depletedvespene

14 Dec 2018, 11:56

Darkshado wrote: I recall reading Farad somewhere, which is the unit of capacitance; no idea how legitimate that claim was.
So close, oh, so close...

(don't I wish :mrgreen: )

andrewjoy

14 Dec 2018, 14:10

If we are going serious , i am pretty sure M stands for membrane.

No idea what F stands for.... flipper ?

User avatar
flowerlandfilms

14 Dec 2018, 15:38

It's important to understand the corporate culture of IBM back in the day (and to a lesser extent now).
IBM made a lot of stuff for a very long time, as such they ran through every number combo and started using letters a long time ago to differentiate product lines. Therefore It doesn't stand for anything other than being another iteration in a long line of tedious and blandly named things.

IBM was a place to go to work, and wear a tie and sing company songs and be VERY VERY SERIOUS.
It was not a place for daydreamers to fiddle-faddle about coming up with cool or interesting names.
Apple is named Apple partially as a direct rebuke to this mode of thinking.
If anyone at IBM was ever caught spending more than two seconds on a naming scheme for a product they would have been summarily fired or possibly shot (fun fact: IBM did make rifles for WW2).

I'm sure the guy who came up with "Selectric" had their entire family sent to a re-education camp where colours other than blue are punishable by death.

As for why letters in this case instead of numbers, it's possibly a continuation of the nomenclature for their Alphabetic Tabulators from the 30's, Models B and C.

User avatar
Chyros

14 Dec 2018, 15:55

There was also a Model C1, etc. which were types of "F", and iirc there were F's that were called Model M as well. I'm really not sure the letter is related to the sensing method. Even if it was, as flowerandfilms mentioned, I doubt it actually abbreviates for anything meaningful.

__red__

15 Dec 2018, 01:18

Pims Cup

User avatar
SneakyRobb
THINK

17 Dec 2018, 21:52

To quote dw

"Membrane buckling spring (often "Model M"), Capacitive buckling spring (sometimes "Model F")"

User avatar
Aer Fixus

19 Dec 2018, 22:01

Chyros wrote: There was also a Model C1, etc. which were types of "F", and iirc there were F's that were called Model M as well. I'm really not sure the letter is related to the sensing method. Even if it was, as flowerandfilms mentioned, I doubt it actually abbreviates for anything meaningful.
To my knowledge, the only Model Fs clearly labeled as Ms were the ones refurbished by Lexmark in the 1990s. They got given new labels (and sometimes part numbers) that mislabeled them as Model M keyboards.

And according to the wiki, the IBM 3178 keyboards had the model name of the terminal C1-4. Those boards, the XT, AT, 4704 and a number of other boards did not have labels claiming what model they were. More simply, they just had stickers their part numbers or even nothing at all.

User avatar
SneakyRobb
THINK

20 Dec 2018, 23:57

I asked the IBM Archives and the guy there Max who is cool referred me to a copy of the IBM SiteLine June 1982 magazine. It discusses how the Keyboard F Mechanisn Manufacturing is doing more with less versus previous keyboards, Specifically the IBM Model B keyboard mechanism and the Model E keyboard mechanism.

It would appear that Model F and Model M are sequential models of keyboard mechanism.

The article mentions that Model B keyboards have an absurd 9 moving parts, where Model F only has 3. I assume the cap, spring and flipper.

So it is actually pretty likely that "M" doesn't reference Membrane at all.

https://imgur.com/a/D9CN4lX

User avatar
Myoth

21 Dec 2018, 00:01

SneakyRobb wrote: The article mentions that Model B keyboards have an absurd 9 moving parts
that's actually probably beamspring

spring
o-ring
slider
stem
beamspring
capacitive plate
housing ?
keycaps ?
????

User avatar
digital_matthew

21 Dec 2018, 03:27

SneakyRobb wrote: I asked the IBM Archives and the guy there Max who is cool referred me to a copy of the IBM SiteLine June 1982 magazine. It discusses how the Keyboard F Mechanisn Manufacturing is doing more with less versus previous keyboards, Specifically the IBM Model B keyboard mechanism and the Model E keyboard mechanism.

It would appear that Model F and Model M are sequential models of keyboard mechanism.

The article mentions that Model B keyboards have an absurd 9 moving parts, where Model F only has 3. I assume the cap, spring and flipper.

So it is actually pretty likely that "M" doesn't reference Membrane at all.

https://imgur.com/a/D9CN4lX
Thanks for that awesome post! I wonder if Ellipse has seen this...

User avatar
Chyros

21 Dec 2018, 16:02

SneakyRobb wrote: I asked the IBM Archives and the guy there Max who is cool referred me to a copy of the IBM SiteLine June 1982 magazine. It discusses how the Keyboard F Mechanisn Manufacturing is doing more with less versus previous keyboards, Specifically the IBM Model B keyboard mechanism and the Model E keyboard mechanism.

It would appear that Model F and Model M are sequential models of keyboard mechanism.

The article mentions that Model B keyboards have an absurd 9 moving parts, where Model F only has 3. I assume the cap, spring and flipper.

So it is actually pretty likely that "M" doesn't reference Membrane at all.

https://imgur.com/a/D9CN4lX
This is simply excellent. You should press him for as much material on these as he can come up with, it is invaluable! :D

Beamsprings have nine parts if you count the keycap, but not all of them (such as the housing and O-ring) are moving. Still, I can't think of anything else IBM made keyboard-wise that was "popular" at the time.

User avatar
JP!

21 Dec 2018, 16:31

That a great read. Now I wish I could travel back in time and tour the factory.

User avatar
digital_matthew

21 Dec 2018, 17:32

I want that key testing job. Also I move that we start saying "Keyboard F" instead of "Model F".

Ellipse

05 Jan 2019, 05:08

Great work SneakyRobb! Thanks for sharing the article.

User avatar
fohat
Elder Messenger

05 Jan 2019, 16:57

"If there were a Weight Watchers Club for keyboards, Keyboard F would get the annual award.
It weighs half as much as earlier keyboards and stands only 1-1/4” thick."

Xubuntu56

05 Jan 2019, 17:34

From IBM support: Differences between 3590 Model B , E, and H Tape Drives
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.w ... s8N1019509
Guessing model designations with a single letter were not restricted to keyboards?

User avatar
matt3o
-[°_°]-

05 Jan 2019, 18:12

this needs to be wikified!

User avatar
Howard81

07 Jan 2019, 00:24

My 1986 IBM XT “enhanced” keyboard (Model M without the LED panel) states Model G in the inner sticker..

User avatar
fohat
Elder Messenger

07 Jan 2019, 01:03

Howard81 wrote: My 1986 IBM XT “enhanced” keyboard (Model M without the LED panel) states Model G in the inner sticker..
That would usually be a 1390120.

Could you please post a photo?

User avatar
Howard81

07 Jan 2019, 21:36

fohat wrote:
07 Jan 2019, 01:03
Howard81 wrote: My 1986 IBM XT “enhanced” keyboard (Model M without the LED panel) states Model G in the inner sticker..
That would usually be a 1390120.

Could you please post a photo?
It's marked 1389969 on the outer case with 1386719 (and 1386751) on the inner chassis. UK ISO layout, so it will have a different part number to the US models. I have three or four of them, all from 1986 or early 1987 and all came with very late IBM 5160/XT systems I collected over the years. I can confirm this as I have a brand new in box IBM 5160/XT with the 1389969 Enhanced keyboard :) All of them have the black cable with the AT DIN plug.

The three 5170/AT Enchanced keyboards I have (silver IBM logo with the lock-light LEDs) are 1391406 on the case sticker. I'll have to crack one open to see what the inner chassis plate state.

This particular one fell apart on me in the late '90s due to broken rivets - I've just carried out a screw mod on it, hence the information was fresh in my mind. Apologies for the bad photos - it's evening here and dark outside! The two XT Enhanced keyboards I have to hand are both rather yellowed.
IMG_0976.jpg
IMG_0976.jpg (916.36 KiB) Viewed 9167 times
IMG_0960.jpg
IMG_0960.jpg (885.7 KiB) Viewed 9167 times

User avatar
Chyros

07 Jan 2019, 22:33

Apart from the Model G thing, an XT Model "M" in ISO is quite the thing.

NOICE.

Post Reply

Return to “Keyboards”