What Are Your IBM Model F Preferences? (XT vs AT vs 122...)

John Doe

12 Dec 2019, 05:17

F122 definitely.

I love huge keyboards with more keys than the normal 101 or 104 layout, but unsaver seems a special case, no chance to get one tho. Does anyone want to sell one here?

User avatar
Muirium
µ

12 Dec 2019, 10:00

This one. Always.

Image

IBM’s HHKB, before even the Macintosh M0110 came along to inspire it!

Fkazim

12 Dec 2019, 11:17

Very nice would love to get a kishy or even an F77.

User avatar
Chyros

12 Dec 2019, 11:34

Muirium wrote:
12 Dec 2019, 10:00
This one. Always.

Image

IBM’s HHKB, before even the Macintosh M0110 came along to inspire it!
When DID the 4704 come out actually? I just realised that I've got no idea what year it was released xD .

User avatar
Muirium
µ

12 Dec 2019, 11:55

Kishy’s original find was made in 1983:

http://kishy.ca/?p=894

I had 4 of them at one point (as Tinnie’s UK proxy) and the oldest was 1983 as I recall. My own is 1986 I think.

viewtopic.php?p=138706#p138706

Fkazim

12 Dec 2019, 12:12

Muirium wrote:
12 Dec 2019, 11:55
Kishy’s original find was made in 1983:

http://kishy.ca/?p=894

I had 4 of them at one point (as Tinnie’s UK proxy) and the oldest was 1983 as I recall. My own is 1986 I think.

viewtopic.php?p=138706#p138706
Oh man now i want one even more thanks a lot lol :lol:

User avatar
sharktastica

12 Dec 2019, 16:20

Chyros wrote:
12 Dec 2019, 11:34

When DID the 4704 come out actually? I just realised that I've got no idea what year it was released xD .
The 4700 system itself was rolled out in 1981, so likely at the same time since the 4704 terminal component would have been integral. Source: https://www.ibm.com/ibm/history/history/year_1981.html

That in itself is interesting, since it means IBM had access to the more relatively modern-looking layout at the same time the Model F XT was being initially fielded.

User avatar
Chyros

13 Dec 2019, 11:15

sharktastica wrote:
12 Dec 2019, 16:20
Chyros wrote:
12 Dec 2019, 11:34

When DID the 4704 come out actually? I just realised that I've got no idea what year it was released xD .
The 4700 system itself was rolled out in 1981, so likely at the same time since the 4704 terminal component would have been integral. Source: https://www.ibm.com/ibm/history/history/year_1981.html

That in itself is interesting, since it means IBM had access to the more relatively modern-looking layout at the same time the Model F XT was being initially fielded.
Modern-looking is a very relative term :p . From what I've read, at the time, nobody had seen anything like the F XT layout before :p .

User avatar
zrrion

13 Dec 2019, 17:13

They'd never seen it before because it was a bad idea and everyone was already using better layouts.

User avatar
Chyros

14 Dec 2019, 07:15

zrrion wrote:
13 Dec 2019, 17:13
They'd never seen it before because it was a bad idea and everyone was already using better layouts.
I didn't say it was a good idea, just that it was a modern one for the time :p .

I don't like any of these popular "space-saving" layouts either. Bring back the 144% layout I say!

User avatar
Elrick

14 Dec 2019, 08:12

Chyros wrote:
14 Dec 2019, 07:15
I don't like any of these popular "space-saving" layouts either. Bring back the 144% layout I say!
DAMN, we're on the same page here.

Have always despised the 'Tiny" keyboards because you need to strap a microscope on your eyeballs to see it. All of a sudden the companies are all trying to make keyboards for babies coming fresh out of wombs. Also needing to press two or three extra keys at once to initiate a single process or command, what the hell is up with that?

Sure you can 'smallify' anything here but it's time for 'normal people' to have something to use each and everyday, in comfort and style.

When you're livin-large you need a Battle Cruiser sized keyboard to enjoy. It has to fill up half the table top because after all, that's what a table is made for.

Post Reply

Return to “Keyboards”