Yeah I tried my mix on them (which I have changed it to N767a 75-25 OKS477), and the result is indistinguishable from OG (same feeling, sliding, smoothness, sound etc). I would dare to say they feel even better because the plastics are freshly polished. The trick is to apply a tiny bit on specific spots on the stem and then slide in and out to get it evenly spread. And then add a bit if need be or gently wipe some off if it gets heavier.andresteare wrote: ↑17 Jul 2021, 19:14Back to this, after polishing, what lube solution did you tried? Nek's 50-50™?NeK wrote: ↑13 Jul 2021, 09:00Nothing from me. I have been pretty busy lately but I will find some time during the summer. Having said that, I can say this:
Besides the lubricant, after various tries I have come to believe that it is more important to properly restore the housing, stem and leafs by polishing them. At least for my test switches, a careful and light polishing made the biggest difference. That restored the switch to a high degree. Very smooth, no binding, much better feeling etc. And without lube.
At that point lubing becomes much more effective essentially completing the restoration to a proper 10/10 condition.
I have to delve into details though about how I do the polishing and that will require a big post. Will do that in the future if there's interest.
My hypothesis is that after polishing, since the surface gets smoother maybe you don't need THAT much viscosity (less rough surface needs less separation) and something like Nyogel 760 would become an alternative?
It's a trial and error process. Although not as complicated as it sounds...
As for the n760g, just forget it. No matter what, it will make it worse. It seems that its hydrocarbons are just too thin (low number of atoms in conjunction with their structure/form) and they don't bond well to the skcm plastics, resulting in an adverse effect.
My "theory" to explain that, is that their HC are not long enough to "fill" in properly the asperities of the skcm plastics, in order to create a contiguous strong oil film that holds the two surfaces apart and prevents them from touching/rubbing. The adverse effect is the result of actually making it easier for the asperities of the surfaces to get bound together, i.e., instead of preventing them from touching, they ease their microscopic troughs of one surface to slide in the valleys of the other surface and get stuck and thus bind the surfaces very strongly together.
Whereas, the N767A has HC that are long enough and/or their form is such that will properly saturate the asperities and create an adequate oil film that actually keeps the surfaces apart, and the sliding friction happens only on top of the oil film, which has very low internal shear resistence and a low friction coefficient. Thus resulting in the smooth slide and no binding.
Again my disclaimer: this is just my (stupid) theory and I may be totally wrong.
Update: and one more important thing to add: this adverse effect happens with other lubes that I tried too, not only N760g. Especially silicon thickened greases! There is probably some correlation of thickener in conjuction with the HC of the base oil.
You see I have dropped "the viscosity is the most important factor" for some time now. Especially when I used a very heavy viscosity lube but with different kind of base oil (Check out my posts about the OKS1110) that had the same issues as the N760g. And this got pretty clear to me when I read that the viscosity of the OG lube was pretty low (in relation).
So the type of base oil and of the thickener is important.