Although Ellipse's reply has indicated that he's going to discard the molds, I don't think that should preclude attempts by others to persuade Ellipse otherwise. Of course, this is Ellipse's project and he holds the final decision over what he does with the molds, but I don't see harm in a little bit of discussion on the matter.
I do personally hope that the molds aren't simply discarded, or that the design can be open-sourced. I've order two keyboards from Ellipse so I'll probably not buy more henceforth. However, I would love the option of getting more keycaps, or spicing things up by switching to other chassis in the far future.
Until we can get an answer from Ellipse, perhaps it could be constructive to consider the pros and cons of selling the manufacturing tools and processes in Ellipse's shoes. I'll list a few that I can think of:
Pros:
- The legacy of the project can continue. Ellipse gave birth to Modern Model Fs and manufactured the first two batches, but other parties can take over the torch.
- (Future) owners of the Modern Model F, as well as owners of old Model Fs may use keycaps, springs, and other components from the continuation of this project to maintain or modify keyboards that they own.
- Eventually, other keyboard designs may emerge using capacitive buckling spring switches based on techniques revived by Ellipse. I'll surely jump on the bandwagon of a capacitive buckling spring Ergodox!
Cons:
- Quality of the keyboard might degrade after other manufacturers take over. This might render some of the advantages listed above moot, and in fact hurt the reputation of even the original keyboards.
- As it stands, the Modern Model F keyboards are going to become rare items given the limited planned production runs. Selling the manufacturing process would completely strip away this project's "legendary" status.
There could be some remedies to the quality concerns. Let's say Ellipse sells the manufacturing process to PLUM, Ellipse (probably) has the option to withhold the chassis and mandate that PLUM makes visually different chassis that would make it easy for anyone to distinguish the differences between Ellipse's Model F and PLUM's Model F. Ellipse could also make PLUM agree to sell the keyboard under other names. I'm no legal expert so those who are more knowledgeable could chime in on this front.
I'll have to end this comment here without a coherent conclusion to get productive at work. To reiterate, I personally think that selling/open-sourcing the project is going to benefit the
community, but this admittedly might not be in Ellipse's best interests. This is Ellipse's project, I'm sure that we will all respect Ellipse's final decision when it comes to that. In the meantime, I don't think some attempts at persuading Ellipse towards selling/open-sourcing the project in the future could hurt as long as we're polite, civil, and constructive!